Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Susan J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-20T16:01:41Z
dc.date.available2017-09-20T16:01:41Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationLindsay, W., Holland, T., Wheeler, J. R., Carson, D., O'Brien, G., Taylor, J., Steptoe, L., Middleton, C., Price, K., Johnston, S. J., et al. (2010). Pathways through services for offenders with intellectual disability: A one- and two-year follow-up study. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115 (3), pp.250-260.
dc.identifier.other10.1352/1944-7558-115.3.250
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/10620
dc.description.abstractThe pathways through services for offenders with intellectual disability were reviewed. Participants were 197 offenders with intellectual disability accepted into three types of community and three types of secure forensic intellectual disability services. They were first compared with 280 participants referred but not accepted into services and were then followed-up for 2 years to review pathways through services. Those accepted into services had a higher charge rate than did those who were referred (46% and 25%, respectively). The greatest diversity in pathway was seen in participants in community forensic intellectual disability and inpatient services. Individuals in secure settings showed the least diversity over time, and, similarly, a relatively high percentage of those accepted into generic community services remained in these services. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
dc.description.urihttp://aaiddjournals.org/doi/full/10.1352/1944-7558-115.3.250
dc.formatFull text uploaded
dc.subjectHealth services accessibility
dc.subjectIntellectual disability
dc.subjectMental disorders
dc.subjectPrisoners
dc.titlePathways through services for offenders with intellectual disability: A one- and two-year follow-up study
dc.typeArticle
refterms.dateFOA2021-06-14T18:03:48Z
html.description.abstractThe pathways through services for offenders with intellectual disability were reviewed. Participants were 197 offenders with intellectual disability accepted into three types of community and three types of secure forensic intellectual disability services. They were first compared with 280 participants referred but not accepted into services and were then followed-up for 2 years to review pathways through services. Those accepted into services had a higher charge rate than did those who were referred (46% and 25%, respectively). The greatest diversity in pathway was seen in participants in community forensic intellectual disability and inpatient services. Individuals in secure settings showed the least diversity over time, and, similarly, a relatively high percentage of those accepted into generic community services remained in these services. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Lindsay 2010 250-262.pdf
Size:
474.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record