Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAdams, Clive E.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-30T11:29:32Z
dc.date.available2017-10-30T11:29:32Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationPurgato, M. & Adams, C. E. (2012). Heterogeneity: The issue of apples, oranges and fruit pie. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 21 (1), pp.27-29.en
dc.identifier.other10.1017/S2045796011000643
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/10850
dc.description.abstractHeterogeneity refers to any kind of variation among studies contributing to the same outcome in a systematic review. There are three broad types of heterogeneity: clinical heterogeneity, methodological heterogeneity and statistical heterogeneity. In this paper, we describe these three types of heterogeneity and the main statistical approaches to measure heterogeneity. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)
dc.subjectConfidence intervalsen
dc.subjectStatisticsen
dc.titleHeterogeneity: The issue of apples, oranges and fruit pieen
dc.typeArticle
html.description.abstractHeterogeneity refers to any kind of variation among studies contributing to the same outcome in a systematic review. There are three broad types of heterogeneity: clinical heterogeneity, methodological heterogeneity and statistical heterogeneity. In this paper, we describe these three types of heterogeneity and the main statistical approaches to measure heterogeneity. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record