Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAdams, Clive E.
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-20T15:56:03Z
dc.date.available2017-09-20T15:56:03Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationAdams, C. E., Polzmacher, S. & Wolff, A. (2013). Systematic reviews: Work that needs to be done and not to be done. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 6 (4), pp.232-235.
dc.identifier.other10.1111/jebm.12072
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/10853
dc.description.abstractSystematic reviews are researches requiring great attention to detail. They may well necessitate considerable investment of effort to ensure relevant data are identified, extracted, synthesized, written up and disseminated. These tasks have already been greatly refined and, in some cases, simplified, by machines. The last two decades have seen remarkable progress in machine-assisted production of reviews - the next two should see much more. Copyright © 2013 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
dc.description.urihttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.12072/abstract
dc.subjectResearch design
dc.titleSystematic reviews: Work that needs to be done and not to be done
dc.typeArticle


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record