Effects of employment as a peer support worker on personal recovery: A review of qualitative evidence
dc.contributor.author | Tickle, Anna C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-18T12:40:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-18T12:40:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bailie, H. A. & Tickle, A. (2015). Effects of employment as a peer support worker on personal recovery: A review of qualitative evidence. Mental Health Review Journal, 20 (1), pp.48-64. | en |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1108/MHRJ-04-2014-0014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/14545 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to systematically identify, appraise and synthesise qualitative research into how working as a peer support worker (PSW) affects personal recovery. Design/methodology/approach: Ten articles were identified through a systematic search of seven databases, grey literature, reference lists, citations and contact with authors in the field. Identified articles were critically appraised and their results synthesised using metaethnography. Findings: There is potential to significantly improve the quality of the research in this field. Four categories were constructed to synthesise the findings of the reviewed studies, which demonstrated that being a PSW has the potential to be both facilitative of and detrimental to personal recovery. Research limitations/implications: The quality of existing studies varies widely. Further, high-quality research is required to specifically investigate the effects of employment as a PSW on personal recovery. Practical implications :The findings are tentative in light of the quality of the studies, but should be considered in the employment, training and ongoing support of PSWs and the services they join. Originality/value: Through its systematic methodology and appraisal of the quality of the studies reviewed, this review adds value to the literature about the effect of working as a PSW on personal recovery. It offers an original synthesis and criteria for measuring the quality of research in this field. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) | |
dc.description.uri | https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/MHRJ-04-2014-001 | |
dc.subject | Employment | en |
dc.subject | Health personnel | en |
dc.subject | Peer support | |
dc.title | Effects of employment as a peer support worker on personal recovery: A review of qualitative evidence | en |
dc.type | Article | |
html.description.abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to systematically identify, appraise and synthesise qualitative research into how working as a peer support worker (PSW) affects personal recovery. Design/methodology/approach: Ten articles were identified through a systematic search of seven databases, grey literature, reference lists, citations and contact with authors in the field. Identified articles were critically appraised and their results synthesised using metaethnography. Findings: There is potential to significantly improve the quality of the research in this field. Four categories were constructed to synthesise the findings of the reviewed studies, which demonstrated that being a PSW has the potential to be both facilitative of and detrimental to personal recovery. Research limitations/implications: The quality of existing studies varies widely. Further, high-quality research is required to specifically investigate the effects of employment as a PSW on personal recovery. Practical implications :The findings are tentative in light of the quality of the studies, but should be considered in the employment, training and ongoing support of PSWs and the services they join. Originality/value: Through its systematic methodology and appraisal of the quality of the studies reviewed, this review adds value to the literature about the effect of working as a PSW on personal recovery. It offers an original synthesis and criteria for measuring the quality of research in this field. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract) |