Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRepper, Julie
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-20T15:55:07Z
dc.date.available2017-09-20T15:55:07Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationPerkins, R. & Repper, J. (2016). Recovery versus risk? From managing risk to the co-production of safety and opportunity. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 20 (2), pp.101-109.
dc.identifier.other10.1108/MHSI-08-2015-0029
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/14653
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose a recovery-focused approach to risk and safety and what this might look like in practice. Design/methodology/approach – Review of recovery approaches and the ways in which traditional approaches to risk might hinder people in their recovery journey. Consideration of the principles of a recovery-focused approach to safety. Findings – A recovery-focused approach to risk based on co-produced safety plans that enable people to do the things they value as safely as possible and shared responsibility for safety. Four key principles of a recovery-focused approach to promoting safety, autonomy and opportunity are proposed. Originality/value – A recovery-focused approach to risk and safety is central to the development of recovery-focused practice within services. This paper outlines such an approach.
dc.description.urihttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/MHSI-08-2015-0029?journalCode=mhsi
dc.subjectRisk assessment
dc.subjectMental health services
dc.subjectRemission induction
dc.titleRecovery versus risk? From managing risk to the co-production of safety and opportunity
dc.typeArticle


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record