Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGuo, Boliang
dc.contributor.authorMorriss, Richard K.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-28T12:20:45Z
dc.date.available2021-07-28T12:20:45Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationGuo, B., Li, L., Crawford, M. J. & Morriss, R. K. (2021). The factor structure of the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder: Exploratory structural equation modelling and measurement invariance over time. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 30(3), pp. e1874.en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1002/mpr.1874
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/14760
dc.description.abstractObjectives There is a lack of independent longitudinal evidence on the factor structure and validity of the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN‐BPD). This study aimed to investigate the dimensionality of ZAN‐BPD and its conceptual consistency over time. Methods Adult BPD participants (n = 276) were recruited for a multicentre, two‐arm randomised clinical trial with ZAN‐BPD measured at baseline and follow up at 12, 24 and 52 weeks. The construct and stability of the ZAN‐BPD across 52 weeks was examined through a measurement equivalence/invariance procedure via Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling. Results Factor analysis results showed that the ZAN‐BPD had a bi‐2 factor structure that was stable over 52 weeks with a general factor and two specific factors. Factor loadings for eight of the nine items were greater for the general factor than the two specific factors. Factor 1 contrasts externalising distress with internalising distress. Factor 2 contrasts depression and self‐destruction with interpersonal anxiety and conflict. Conclusion ZAN‐BPD is a conceptually and empirically valid measure of total BPD symptom severity in BPD patients over time suitable for use in clinical trials. Two factors related to the expression of distress and self‐harm may be utilised as possible predictors of outcome. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)
dc.description.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.1874
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBorderline personality disorderen_US
dc.subjectPsychiatric status rating scalesen_US
dc.titleThe factor structure of the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder: Exploratory structural equation modelling and measurement invariance over timeen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2021-05-12
html.description.abstractObjectives There is a lack of independent longitudinal evidence on the factor structure and validity of the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN‐BPD). This study aimed to investigate the dimensionality of ZAN‐BPD and its conceptual consistency over time. Methods Adult BPD participants (n = 276) were recruited for a multicentre, two‐arm randomised clinical trial with ZAN‐BPD measured at baseline and follow up at 12, 24 and 52 weeks. The construct and stability of the ZAN‐BPD across 52 weeks was examined through a measurement equivalence/invariance procedure via Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling. Results Factor analysis results showed that the ZAN‐BPD had a bi‐2 factor structure that was stable over 52 weeks with a general factor and two specific factors. Factor loadings for eight of the nine items were greater for the general factor than the two specific factors. Factor 1 contrasts externalising distress with internalising distress. Factor 2 contrasts depression and self‐destruction with interpersonal anxiety and conflict. Conclusion ZAN‐BPD is a conceptually and empirically valid measure of total BPD symptom severity in BPD patients over time suitable for use in clinical trials. Two factors related to the expression of distress and self‐harm may be utilised as possible predictors of outcome. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record