Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
To have and to hold: An exploratory qualitative study exploring why research participants with treatment-resistant depression undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment requested copies of their research brain MRI scansPURPOSE: There has been little research providing an in-depth exploration of the reasons behind research participants, particularly in mental health settings, requesting copies of their research data, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. BRIGhTMIND is a large double blind randomised controlled trial using functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging to create personalised targets for transcranial magnetic stimulation delivery, and a number of trial participants requested copies of these scans. METHODS: Seven participants involved in the BRIGhTMIND trial completed semi-structured interviews exploring their reasons behind their request for copies of their MRI scans. The qualitative data was co-analysed between researchers and patient and public involvement and engagement representatives using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: The interviews produced consistent themes concerning curiosity to visualise their MRI scans, and the hope that their participation would result in a better understanding of the nature and future treatment of depression. Concerns around the rights to access their own personal health data emerged as a clear theme as did their own ability to interpret any radiological information. DISCUSSION: This study provides insight into the reasons why research participants with depression would like to retain copies of their MRI scans and the perceived role that such techniques may have for improving research and neuromodulation treatments in depression. Such first-hand experiential accounts emphasises the importance of listening to participants perspectives and lived experience, in order to improve research and health outcomes. Future research could aim to provide greater verbal and written information for participants, including details about the accessibility to their MRI scans, the difference between research and clinical MRI scans, and educational materials to help with the interpretation of MRI images.
-
Variability of noninvasive MRI and biological markers in compensated cirrhosis: Insights for assessing disease progressionBACKGROUND: We annually monitored stable compensated cirrhosis (CC) patients to evaluate serial variation in blood serum, liver stiffness, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) measures to provide reference change values (RCV) and sample size measures for future studies. METHODS: Patients were recruited from a prospectively followed CC cohort, with assessments at baseline and annually over three years. We report on blood markers, transient elastography liver stiffness measures (LSM) and noninvasive mpMRI (volume, T1 mapping, blood flow, perfusion) of the liver, spleen, kidneys, and heart in a stable CC group and a healthy volunteer (HV) group. Coefficient of variation over time (CoVT) and RCV are reported, along with hazard ratio to assess disease progression. Sample size estimates to power future trials of cirrhosis regression on mpMRI are presented. RESULTS: Of 60 CC patients enrolled, 28 with stable CC were followed longitudinally and compared to 10 HVs. CoVT in mpMRI measures was comparable between CC and HV groups. CoVT of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score was low ( of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score was low (T (20.7%) and RCV (48.3%) were observed for LSM. CoVT and RCV were low for liver, spleen, and renal T1 values (CoVT T T 12-25%, RCV 16-47%). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of low CoVT and RCV in multiorgan T1 values. RCV and sample size estimates are provided for future longitudinal multiorgan monitoring in CC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02037867 , Registered: 05/01/2013. Copyright © 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging connectivity features associated with response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorderTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an FDA-approved neuromodulation treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), thought to work by altering dysfunctional brain connectivity pathways, or by indirectly modulating the activity of subcortical brain regions. Clinical response to TMS remains highly variable, highlighting the need for baseline predictors of response and for understanding brain changes associated with response. This systematic review examined brain connectivity features, and changes in connectivity features, associated with clinical improvement following TMS in MDD. Forty-one studies met inclusion criteria, including 1097 people with MDD. Most studies delivered one of two types of TMS to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and measured connectivity using resting-state functional MRI. The subgenual anterior cingulate cortex was the most well-studied brain region, particularly its connectivity with the TMS target or with the "executive control network" of brain regions. There was marked heterogeneity in findings. There is a need for greater understanding of how cortical TMS modulates connectivity with, and the activity of, subcortical regions, and how these effects change within and across treatment sessions.
