• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    • Conditions and Diseases
    • Mental Health and Behavioural Conditions
    • Mental Health and Behavioural Conditions: General and Other
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    • Conditions and Diseases
    • Mental Health and Behavioural Conditions
    • Mental Health and Behavioural Conditions: General and Other
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Impact of clinical decision-making participation and satisfaction on outcomes in mental health practice: results from the CEDAR European longitudinal study

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Slade, Mike
    Keyword
    Clinical decision-making
    Quality of life
    Mental disorders
    Date
    2022
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.1080/09540261.2022.2085507
    Publisher's URL
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09540261.2022.2085507
    Abstract
    The present study aimed to assess: (1) whether a more active involvement of patients is associated with an improvement of clinical symptoms, global functioning, and quality-of-life; and (2) how patients’ satisfaction with clinical decisions can lead to better outcome after 1 year. Data were collected as part of the study ‘Clinical decision-making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness (CEDAR)’, a longitudinal observational study, funded by the European Commission and carried out in six European countries. Patients’ inclusion criteria were: (a) aged between 18 and 60 years; (b) diagnosis of a severe mental illness of any kind according to the Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG) ≥ 5 and duration of illness ≥ 2 years; (c) expected contact with the local mental health service during the 12-month observation period; (d) adequate skills in the language of the host countries; and (e) the ability to provide written informed consent. The clinical decision-making styles of clinicians and the patient satisfaction with decisions were assessed using the Clinical Decision Making Style and the Clinical Decision Making Involvement and Satisfaction scales, respectively. Patients were assessed at baseline and 1 year after the recruitment. The sample consisted of 588 patients with severe mental illness, mainly female, with a mean age of 41.69 (±10.74) and a mean duration of illness of 12.5 (±9.27) years. The majority of patients were diagnosed with psychotic (45.75%) or affective disorders (34.01%). At baseline, a shared CDM style was preferred by 70.6% of clinicians and about 40% of patients indicated a high level of satisfaction with the decision and 31% a medium level of satisfaction. Higher participation in clinical decisions was associated with improved social functioning and quality-of-life, and reduced interpersonal conflicts, sense of loneliness, feelings of inadequacy, and withdrawal in friendships after 1 year (p < 0.05). Moreover, a higher satisfaction with decisions was associated with a better quality-of-life (p < 0.0001), reduced symptom severity (p < 0.0001), and a significantly lower illness burden associated with symptoms of distress (p < 0.0001), interpersonal difficulties (p < 0.0001), and problems in social roles (p < 0.05). Our findings clearly show that a higher involvement in and satisfaction of patients with clinical decision-making was associated with better outcomes. More efforts have to be made to increase the involvement of patients in clinical decision-making in routine care settings. © 2022 Institute of Psychiatry and Johns Hopkins University.
    Citation
    Luciano, M., Fiorillo, A., Brandi, C., Di Vincenzo, M., Egerhazi, A., Hiltensperger, R., Kawhol, W., Kovacs, A. I., Rossler, W., Slade, M., et al. (2022). Impact of clinical decision-making participation and satisfaction on outcomes in mental health practice: results from the CEDAR European longitudinal study. International Review of Psychiatry, DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2085507
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/15685
    Collections
    Mental Health and Behavioural Conditions: General and Other

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.