Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPanek, Rafal
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T12:11:22Z
dc.date.available2022-10-25T12:11:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPawalowski, B., Panek, R., Szweda, H. and Piotrowski, T. (2020) 'Combination of dual-energy computed tomography and iterative metal artefact reduction to increase general quality of imaging for radiotherapy patients with high dense materials. Phantom study', Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 77, pp. 92-99. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.08.009.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1724-191X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/15873
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To evaluate the use of pseudo-monoenergetic reconstructions (PMR) from dual-energy computed tomography, combined with the iterative metal artefact reduction (iMAR) method., METHODS: Pseudo-monoenergetic CT images were obtained using the dual-energy mode on the Siemens Somatom Definition AS scanner. A range of PMR combinations (70-130 keV) were used with and without iMAR. A Virtual Water TM phantom was used for quantitative assessment of error in the presence of high density materials: titanium, alloys 330 and 600. The absolute values of CT number differences (AD) and normalised standard deviations (NSD) were calculated for different phantom positions. Image quality was assessed using an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom with an embedded hip prosthesis. Image quality was scored blindly by five observers., RESULTS: AD and NSD values revealed differences in CT number errors between tested sets. AD and NSD were reduced in the vicinity of metal for images with iMAR (p < 0.001 for AD/NSD). For ROIs away from metal, with and without iMAR, 70 keV PMR and pCT AD values were lower than for the other reconstructions (p = 0.039). Similarly, iMAR NSD values measured away from metal were lower for 130 keV and 70 keV PMR (p = 0.002). Image quality scores were higher for 70 keV and 130 keV PMR with iMAR (p = 0.034)., CONCLUSION: The use of 70 keV PMR with iMAR allows for significant metal artefact reduction and low CT number errors observed in the vicinity of dense materials. It is therefore an attractive alternative to high keV imaging when imaging patients with metallic implants, especially in the context of radiotherapy planning. Copyright © 2020 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.08.009en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectArtifactsen_US
dc.subjectPhantoms, imagingen_US
dc.subjectMetalsen_US
dc.titleCombination of dual-energy computed tomography and iterative metal artefact reduction to increase general quality of imaging for radiotherapy patients with high dense materials. Phantom studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.08.009en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.dateFCD2022-10-25T12:11:24Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
html.description.abstractPURPOSE: To evaluate the use of pseudo-monoenergetic reconstructions (PMR) from dual-energy computed tomography, combined with the iterative metal artefact reduction (iMAR) method., METHODS: Pseudo-monoenergetic CT images were obtained using the dual-energy mode on the Siemens Somatom Definition AS scanner. A range of PMR combinations (70-130 keV) were used with and without iMAR. A Virtual Water TM phantom was used for quantitative assessment of error in the presence of high density materials: titanium, alloys 330 and 600. The absolute values of CT number differences (AD) and normalised standard deviations (NSD) were calculated for different phantom positions. Image quality was assessed using an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom with an embedded hip prosthesis. Image quality was scored blindly by five observers., RESULTS: AD and NSD values revealed differences in CT number errors between tested sets. AD and NSD were reduced in the vicinity of metal for images with iMAR (p < 0.001 for AD/NSD). For ROIs away from metal, with and without iMAR, 70 keV PMR and pCT AD values were lower than for the other reconstructions (p = 0.039). Similarly, iMAR NSD values measured away from metal were lower for 130 keV and 70 keV PMR (p = 0.002). Image quality scores were higher for 70 keV and 130 keV PMR with iMAR (p = 0.034)., CONCLUSION: The use of 70 keV PMR with iMAR allows for significant metal artefact reduction and low CT number errors observed in the vicinity of dense materials. It is therefore an attractive alternative to high keV imaging when imaging patients with metallic implants, especially in the context of radiotherapy planning. Copyright © 2020 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record