Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorManning, Joseph C
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T13:12:59Z
dc.date.available2022-10-25T13:12:59Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationIsta, E., Scholefield, B.R., Manning, J.C., Harth, I., Gawronski, O., Bartkowska-Sniatkowska, A., Ramelet, A., Kudchadkar, S.R. and EU PARK-PICU, C. (2020) 'Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)', Critical Care (London, England), 24(1), pp. 368. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1466-609X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/15876
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Early mobilization of adults receiving intensive care improves health outcomes, yet little is known about mobilization practices in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical rehabilitation in PICUs across Europe., METHODS: A 2-day, cross-sectional, multicentre point prevalence study was conducted in May and November 2018. The primary outcome was the prevalence of physical therapy (PT)- or occupational therapy (OT)-provided mobility. Clinical data and data on patient mobility, potential mobility safety events, and mobilization barriers were prospectively collected in patients admitted for >=72 h., RESULTS: Data of 456 children admitted to one of 38 participating PICUs from 15 European countries were collected (456 patient days); 70% were under 3 years of age. The point prevalence of PT- and/or OT-provided mobility activities was 39% (179/456) (95% CI 34.7-43.9%) during the patient days, with significant differences between European regions. Nurses were involved in 72% (924/1283) of the mobility events; in the remaining 28%, PT/OT, physicians, family members, or other professionals were involved. Of the factors studied, family presence was most strongly positively associated with out-of-bed mobilization (aOR 7.83, 95% CI 3.09-19.79). Invasive mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube was negatively associated with out-of-bed mobility (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.68). Patients were completely immobile on 25% (115/456) of patient days. Barriers to mobilization were reported on 38% of patient days. The most common reported patient-related barriers were cardiovascular instability (n = 47, 10%), oversedation (n = 39, 9%), and medical contraindication (n = 37, 8%). Potential safety events occurred in 6% of all documented mobilization events., CONCLUSION: Therapists are infrequently consulted for mobilization of critically ill children in European PICUs. This study highlights the need for a systematic and interdisciplinary mobilization approach for critically ill children.
dc.description.urihttps://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectChilden_US
dc.subjectEarly ambulationen_US
dc.subjectIntensive care unitsen_US
dc.titleMobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.dateFCD2022-10-25T13:13:00Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-10-25T13:13:00Z
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2020-06-24
html.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Early mobilization of adults receiving intensive care improves health outcomes, yet little is known about mobilization practices in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical rehabilitation in PICUs across Europe., METHODS: A 2-day, cross-sectional, multicentre point prevalence study was conducted in May and November 2018. The primary outcome was the prevalence of physical therapy (PT)- or occupational therapy (OT)-provided mobility. Clinical data and data on patient mobility, potential mobility safety events, and mobilization barriers were prospectively collected in patients admitted for >=72 h., RESULTS: Data of 456 children admitted to one of 38 participating PICUs from 15 European countries were collected (456 patient days); 70% were under 3 years of age. The point prevalence of PT- and/or OT-provided mobility activities was 39% (179/456) (95% CI 34.7-43.9%) during the patient days, with significant differences between European regions. Nurses were involved in 72% (924/1283) of the mobility events; in the remaining 28%, PT/OT, physicians, family members, or other professionals were involved. Of the factors studied, family presence was most strongly positively associated with out-of-bed mobilization (aOR 7.83, 95% CI 3.09-19.79). Invasive mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube was negatively associated with out-of-bed mobility (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.68). Patients were completely immobile on 25% (115/456) of patient days. Barriers to mobilization were reported on 38% of patient days. The most common reported patient-related barriers were cardiovascular instability (n = 47, 10%), oversedation (n = 39, 9%), and medical contraindication (n = 37, 8%). Potential safety events occurred in 6% of all documented mobilization events., CONCLUSION: Therapists are infrequently consulted for mobilization of critically ill children in European PICUs. This study highlights the need for a systematic and interdisciplinary mobilization approach for critically ill children.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Mobilization practices in ...
Size:
751.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record