• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    • Clinical Support
    • Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    • Clinical Support
    • Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Quantitative FIT stratification is superior to NICE referral criteria NG12 in a high-risk colorectal cancer population

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Quantitative FIT stratification ...
    Size:
    525.2Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Bailey, James A
    Ibrahim, H
    Bunce, J
    Chapman, Caroline J
    Morling, Joanne R
    Simpson, J
    Humes, David J
    Banerjea, Ayan
    Keyword
    Colorectal neoplasms
    Faecal immunochemical testing
    Date
    2021
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher's URL
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02466-z
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: Guidelines for urgent investigation of colorectal cancer (CRC) are based on age and symptom-based criteria. This study aims to compare the diagnostic value of clinical features and faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results to identify those at a higher risk of CRC, thereby facilitating effective triage of patients., METHODS: We undertook a review of all patients referred for investigation of CRC at our centre between September 2016 and June 2018. Patients were identified using a prospectively recorded local database. We performed a logistic regression analysis of factors associated with a diagnosis of CRC., RESULTS: One-thousand-and-seven-hundred-eighty-four patients with FIT results were included in the study. Change in bowel habit (CIBH) was the most common referring clinical feature (38.3%). Patients diagnosed with CRC were significantly older than those without malignancy (74.0 years vs 68.9 years, p = 0.0007). Male patients were more likely to be diagnosed with CRC than females (6.5% vs 2.5%, Chi-squared 16.93, p = 100 microg Hb/g faeces group (55/181, 30.4%)., CONCLUSION: In a multivariate model, FIT outperforms age, sex and all symptoms prompting referral. FIT has greater stratification value than any referral symptoms. FIT does have value in patients with iron deficiency anaemia. Copyright © 2021. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
    Citation
    Bailey, J.A., Ibrahim, H., Bunce, J., Chapman, C.J., Morling, J.R., Simpson, J.A., Humes, D.J. and Banerjea, A. (2021) 'Quantitative FIT stratification is superior to NICE referral criteria NG12 in a high-risk colorectal cancer population', Techniques in Coloproctology, 25(10), pp. 1151-1154. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02466-z.
    Publisher
    Springer Nature
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/16100
    Collections
    Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering
    Healthcare Scientists

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.