Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHall, Charlotte L.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-16T11:50:01Z
dc.date.available2023-02-16T11:50:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationChitsabesan, P., Hall, C. L., Carter, L. A., Reeves, M., Mohammed, V., Beresford, B., Young, S., Kraam, A., Trowse, S., Wilkinson-Cunningham, L., et al. (2022). Using an objective computer task (QbTest) to aid the identification of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the Children and Young People Secure Estate (CYPSE): a feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 12, pp.e064951.en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064951
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/16151
dc.description© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: QbTest has been shown to improve time to decision/diagnosis for young people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The aim was to assess the feasibility of QbTest for young people in prison. DESIGN: Single-centre feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), with 1:1 allocation. Concealed random allocation using an online pseudorandom list with random permuted blocks of varying sizes. SETTING: One Young Offenders Institution in England. PARTICIPANTS: 355 young people aged 15-18 years displaying possible symptoms of ADHD were assessed for eligibility, 69 were eligible to take part and 60 were randomised. INTERVENTION: QbTest-a computer task measuring attention, activity and impulsivity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eligibility, recruitment and retention rates and acceptability of randomisation and trial participation. RESULTS: Of the 355 young people assessed for eligibility, 69 were eligible and 60 were randomised (n=30 QbTest plus usual care; n=30 usual care alone). The study achieved the specified recruitment target. Trial participation and randomisation were deemed acceptable by the majority of participants. 78% of young people were followed up at 3 months, but only 32% at 6 months, although this was also affected by COVID-19 restrictions. Secondary outcomes were mixed. Participants including clinical staff were mostly supportive of the study and QbTest; however, some young people found QbTest hard and there were issues with implementation of the ADHD care pathway. There were no serious adverse events secondary to the study or intervention and no one was withdrawn from the study due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: With adaptations, a fully powered RCT may be achievable to evaluate the effectiveness of QbTest in the assessment of ADHD in the Children and Young People Secure Estate, with time to decision (days) as the primary outcome measure. However, further programme developmental work is required to address some of the challenges highlighted prior to a larger trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17402196.
dc.description.urihttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/12/e064951en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAttention deficit disorder with hyperactivityen_US
dc.subjectComputer-assisted diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectPrisonersen_US
dc.titleUsing an objective computer task (QbTest) to aid the identification of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the Children and Young People Secure Estate (CYPSE): a feasibility randomised controlled trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.dateFOA2024-05-09T13:09:12Z
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-12-16
html.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: QbTest has been shown to improve time to decision/diagnosis for young people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The aim was to assess the feasibility of QbTest for young people in prison. DESIGN: Single-centre feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), with 1:1 allocation. Concealed random allocation using an online pseudorandom list with random permuted blocks of varying sizes. SETTING: One Young Offenders Institution in England. PARTICIPANTS: 355 young people aged 15-18 years displaying possible symptoms of ADHD were assessed for eligibility, 69 were eligible to take part and 60 were randomised. INTERVENTION: QbTest-a computer task measuring attention, activity and impulsivity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eligibility, recruitment and retention rates and acceptability of randomisation and trial participation. RESULTS: Of the 355 young people assessed for eligibility, 69 were eligible and 60 were randomised (n=30 QbTest plus usual care; n=30 usual care alone). The study achieved the specified recruitment target. Trial participation and randomisation were deemed acceptable by the majority of participants. 78% of young people were followed up at 3 months, but only 32% at 6 months, although this was also affected by COVID-19 restrictions. Secondary outcomes were mixed. Participants including clinical staff were mostly supportive of the study and QbTest; however, some young people found QbTest hard and there were issues with implementation of the ADHD care pathway. There were no serious adverse events secondary to the study or intervention and no one was withdrawn from the study due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: With adaptations, a fully powered RCT may be achievable to evaluate the effectiveness of QbTest in the assessment of ADHD in the Children and Young People Secure Estate, with time to decision (days) as the primary outcome measure. However, further programme developmental work is required to address some of the challenges highlighted prior to a larger trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17402196.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
2022 Chitsabesan 1-12.pdf
Size:
558.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record