Early versus delayed repair of traumatic rotator cuff tears. Does timing matter on outcomes?
Author
Patel, VishalThomas, Christopher
Fort, Helen
Wood, Richard
Modi, Amit
Pandey, Radhakant
Singh, Harvinder
Armstrong, Alison
Keyword
Delayed repairEarly repair
Graft jacket
Rotator cuff repair
Shoulder outcomes
Traumatic rotator cuff repair
Date
2021-04-03
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher's URL
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00590-021-02962-wAbstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine if delay (before or after 4 months) in repairing a symptomatic traumatic rotator cuff tear affected clinical outcome, re-rupture rates and use of interpositional dermal grafts. Methods: This was a case matched (age + tear size) series of patients who underwent an early (≤ 4 months) or delayed (> 4 months) rotator cuff repair following a traumatic tear. If a direct repair could not be achieved a dermal interposition graft was used. Outcomes were collected at a median time of 30 months post-operatively using the Oxford, Constant and EQ5D scores. Results: Twenty patients underwent rotator cuff repair within 4 months (1-4) of injury. Twenty age and cuff tear size-matched patients were identified who had undergone a delayed repair (4.1-24 months) after injury. We found no significant difference (p > 0.05) in patient reported outcomes scores between the early and delayed repair. [Oxford scores; Early 43(13-48), Delayed 45 (31-48); Constant scores; Early 73 (21-94), Delayed 73.5 (44-87); EQ5D; Early 0.75 (0.25-1), Delayed 0.77 (0.4-1)]. Time to full recovery was significantly longer (14 vs 33.8 months) for the delayed repair group (P > 0.05). When cuff tears were subdivided into < 3 cm tears or ≥ 3 cm tears, no significant difference outcome scores were founds. However, use of dermal interposition graft was 44% in delayed group for tears ≥ 3 cm. No grafts were used in early repair group. There was one symptomatic re-tear in our series which was in the early repair group. Conclusion: When compared to the delayed repair group, patients that underwent early repair of traumatic rotator cuff tears had shorter time of recovery, and less need for allograft augmentation for tears 3 cm or greater. However, at mid-term follow-up, this study found no difference in patient reported outcomes following early versus delayed repair of traumatic rotator cuff tears. Level of evidence: 3.Citation
Patel, V., Thomas, C., Fort, H., Wood, R., Modi, A., Pandey, R., Singh, H., & Armstrong, A. (2022). Early versus delayed repair of traumatic rotator cuff tears. Does timing matter on outcomes?. European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 32(2), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02962-wType
ArticleCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Lynch Syndrome Screening in Gynecological Cancers: Results of an International Survey with Recommendations for Uniform Reporting Terminology for Mismatch Repair Immunohistochemistry Results.Van Schalkwyk, Gerhard (2019-07)AIM: Lynch Syndrome (LS) is associated with an increased risk of developing endometrial carcinoma (EC) and ovarian carcinoma (OC). There is considerable variability in current practices and opinions related to screening newly diagnosed patients with EC/OC for LS. An online survey was undertaken to explore the extent of these differences. METHODS: An online questionnaire was developed by a panel of experts and sent to all members of the British Association of Gynaecological Pathologists (BAGP) and the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (ISGyP). Anonymised results were received and analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-six BAGP and 44 ISGyP members completed the survey. More than 90% of respondents were aware of the association of LS with both EC and OC, but 34% were not aware of specific guidelines for LS screening. Seventy-one percent of respondents agreed that universal screening for LS should be carried out in all newly diagnosed EC cases, with immunohistochemistry (IHC) alone as the preferred approach. Only 36% of respondents currently performed IHC or microsatellite instability testing on all newly diagnosed EC, with most of the remaining respondents practicing selective screening, based on clinical or pathological features or both. A significant minority of respondents (35%) believed that patient consent was required before performing MMR IHC. Almost all respondents favored use of standardized terminology for reporting MMR staining results and this is proposed herein. CONCLUSION: There is wide support for universal LS screening in patients with EC, but this survey highlights areas of considerable variation in practice.
-
Porcine dermal collagen graft for tracheoesophageal fistula repair.Judd, Owen; McClelland, Lisha; Sharp, Jeremy (2010-03)
-
Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus local infiltration anaesthesia in pain relief during repair of perineal trauma after vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.El-Shamy, Tarek; James, Cathryn (2018-08)BACKGROUND: Perineal trauma is a common problem that may affect women during vaginal delivery; this trauma can either spontaneous (tear) or intentional (episiotomy). When repair of perineal trauma is required, adequate analgesics must be obtained. Topical products as lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream is one of the suggested methods, but still there is lack of evidence with regard to its efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to assess the evidence of utilizing EMLA cream in comparison to local perineal infiltration anaesthesia for pain control during perineal repair after vaginal delivery. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Dynamed Plus, ScienceDirect, TRIP database, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library were searched electronically from January 2006 to May 2018 for studies investigating the effect of lidocaine-prilocaine cream in relieving pain during repair of perineal trauma. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All randomized controlled trials assessing effect of lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus local infiltration anaesthesia in relieving pain during repair of perineal trauma were considered for this meta-analysis. Fifteen studies were identified of which four studies deemed eligible for this review. Quality and risk of bias assessment was performed for all studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Two researchers independently extracted the data from the individual articles and entered into RevMan software. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Statistical heterogeneity between studies was assessed by the Higgins chi-square and (I2) statistics. When heterogeneity was significant, a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Otherwise, fixed effect meta-analysis was used when there was no significant heterogeneity. RESULTS: Pooled analysis of result in "pain score" was insignificant between the two groups (WMD -1.11; 95% CI (-2.55 to 0.33); p = 0.13). Furthermore, the use of additional analgesia showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (WMD 1.34; 95% CI (0.66-2.71), p = 0.42). Regarding patient satisfaction, overall analysis of three studies showed significant results favouring EMLA cream group users (WMD 4.65; 95% CI (1.96-11.03), p = 0.0005). The pooled analysis of the outcome "duration of repair" showed significantly shorter duration of repair in EMLA cream users (n = 92) than local infiltration anaesthesia (n = 95) (1.72 min; 95% CI (-2.76 to -0.67), p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that topical lidocaine-prilocaine cream gives comparable results in reducing pain during perineal repair after vaginal delivery.