Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoyle, Elaine
dc.contributor.authorPillay, Thillagavathie
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-10T10:59:37Z
dc.date.available2023-03-10T10:59:37Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-27
dc.identifier.citationCupit, C., Paton, A., Boyle, E., Pillay, T., Armstrong, N., & OPTI-PREM Study Team (2022). Managerial thinking in neonatal care: a qualitative study of place of care decision-making for preterm babies born at 27-31 weeks gestation in England. BMJ open, 12(6), e059428. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059428en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059428
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/16342
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Preterm babies born between 27 and 31 weeks of gestation in England are usually born and cared for in either a neonatal intensive care unit or a local neonatal unit-with such units forming part of Operational Delivery Networks. As part of a national project seeking to optimise service delivery for this group of babies (OPTI-PREM), we undertook qualitative research to better understand how decisions about place of birth and care are made and operationalised. Design: Qualitative analysis of ethnographic observation data in neonatal units and semi-structured interviews with neonatal staff. Setting: Six neonatal units across two neonatal networks in England. Two were neonatal intensive care units and four were local neonatal units. Participants: Clinical staff (n=15) working in neonatal units, and people present in neonatal units during periods of observation. Results: In the context of real-world neonatal practice, with multiple (and rapidly-evolving) uncertainties relating to mothers, babies and unit/network capacity, 'best place of care' protocols were only one element of much more complex decision-making processes. Staff often made judgements from a less-than-ideal starting point, and were forced to respond to evolving clinical and organisational factors. In particular, we report that managerial considerations relating to demand and capacity organised decision-making; demand and capacity management was time-consuming and generated various pressures on families, and tensions between staff. Conclusions: Researchers and policymakers should take account of the organisational context within which place of care decisions are made. The dominance of demand and capacity management considerations is likely to limit the impact of other improvement interventions, such as initiatives to integrate families into the neonatal care provision. Demand and capacity management is an important element of neonatal care that may be overlooked, but significantly organises how care is delivered.
dc.description.urihttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e059428en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectFetal medicineen_US
dc.subjectHealth services administration and managementen_US
dc.subjectNeonatal intensive and critical careen_US
dc.subjectNeonatologyen_US
dc.subjectQualitative researchen_US
dc.subjectSocial medicineen_US
dc.titleManagerial thinking in neonatal care: a qualitative study of place of care decision-making for preterm babies born at 27-31 weeks gestation in Englanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059428en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
html.description.abstractObjectives: Preterm babies born between 27 and 31 weeks of gestation in England are usually born and cared for in either a neonatal intensive care unit or a local neonatal unit-with such units forming part of Operational Delivery Networks. As part of a national project seeking to optimise service delivery for this group of babies (OPTI-PREM), we undertook qualitative research to better understand how decisions about place of birth and care are made and operationalised. Design: Qualitative analysis of ethnographic observation data in neonatal units and semi-structured interviews with neonatal staff. Setting: Six neonatal units across two neonatal networks in England. Two were neonatal intensive care units and four were local neonatal units. Participants: Clinical staff (n=15) working in neonatal units, and people present in neonatal units during periods of observation. Results: In the context of real-world neonatal practice, with multiple (and rapidly-evolving) uncertainties relating to mothers, babies and unit/network capacity, 'best place of care' protocols were only one element of much more complex decision-making processes. Staff often made judgements from a less-than-ideal starting point, and were forced to respond to evolving clinical and organisational factors. In particular, we report that managerial considerations relating to demand and capacity organised decision-making; demand and capacity management was time-consuming and generated various pressures on families, and tensions between staff. Conclusions: Researchers and policymakers should take account of the organisational context within which place of care decisions are made. The dominance of demand and capacity management considerations is likely to limit the impact of other improvement interventions, such as initiatives to integrate families into the neonatal care provision. Demand and capacity management is an important element of neonatal care that may be overlooked, but significantly organises how care is delivered.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record