Opportunities in cancer imaging: Risk-adapted breast imaging in screening
dc.contributor.author | James, Jonathan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-13T11:03:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-13T11:03:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gilbert, F.J., Hickman, S.E., Baxter, G.C., Allajbeu, I., James, J., Caraco, C. and Vinnicombe, S. (2021) 'Opportunities in cancer imaging: risk-adapted breast imaging in screening', Clinical Radiology, 76(10), pp. 763-773. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.02.013. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-229X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/16388 | |
dc.description.abstract | In the UK, women between 50-70 years are invited for 3-yearly mammography screening irrespective of their likelihood of developing breast cancer. The only risk adaption is for women with >30% lifetime risk who are offered annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography, and annual mammography for some moderate-risk women. Using questionnaires, breast density, and polygenic risk scores, it is possible to stratify the population into the lowest 20% risk, who will develop <4% of cancers and the top 4%, who will develop 18% of cancers. Mammography is a good screening test but has low sensitivity of 60% in the 9% of women with the highest category of breast density (BIRADS D) who have a 2.5- to fourfold breast cancer risk. There is evidence that adding ultrasound to the screening mammogram can increase the cancer detection rate and reduce advanced stage interval and next round cancers. Similarly, alternative tests such as contrast-enhanced mammography (CESM) or abbreviated MRI (ABB-MRI) are much more effective in detecting cancer in women with dense breasts. Scintimammography has been shown to be a viable alternative for dense breasts or for follow-up in those with a personal history of breast cancer and scarring as result of treatment. For supplemental screening to be worthwhile in these women, new technologies need to reduce the number of stage II cancers and be cost effective when tested in large scale trials. This article reviews the evidence for supplemental imaging and examines whether a risk-stratified approach is feasible. Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | |
dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2021.02.013 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd. | en_US |
dc.subject | Breast cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | Magnetic resonance imaging | en_US |
dc.subject | Mammography | en_US |
dc.title | Opportunities in cancer imaging: Risk-adapted breast imaging in screening | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
rioxxterms.funder | Default funder | en_US |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | Default project | en_US |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_US |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1016/j.crad.2021.02.013 | en_US |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_US |
refterms.dateFCD | 2023-03-13T11:03:12Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.panel | Unspecified | en_US |
html.description.abstract | In the UK, women between 50-70 years are invited for 3-yearly mammography screening irrespective of their likelihood of developing breast cancer. The only risk adaption is for women with >30% lifetime risk who are offered annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography, and annual mammography for some moderate-risk women. Using questionnaires, breast density, and polygenic risk scores, it is possible to stratify the population into the lowest 20% risk, who will develop <4% of cancers and the top 4%, who will develop 18% of cancers. Mammography is a good screening test but has low sensitivity of 60% in the 9% of women with the highest category of breast density (BIRADS D) who have a 2.5- to fourfold breast cancer risk. There is evidence that adding ultrasound to the screening mammogram can increase the cancer detection rate and reduce advanced stage interval and next round cancers. Similarly, alternative tests such as contrast-enhanced mammography (CESM) or abbreviated MRI (ABB-MRI) are much more effective in detecting cancer in women with dense breasts. Scintimammography has been shown to be a viable alternative for dense breasts or for follow-up in those with a personal history of breast cancer and scarring as result of treatment. For supplemental screening to be worthwhile in these women, new technologies need to reduce the number of stage II cancers and be cost effective when tested in large scale trials. This article reviews the evidence for supplemental imaging and examines whether a risk-stratified approach is feasible. Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
rioxxterms.funder.project | 94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cd | en_US |