• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
    • UHL Renal, Respiratory and Cardiovascular
    • UHL Cardiology
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
    • UHL Renal, Respiratory and Cardiovascular
    • UHL Cardiology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNottingham and Nottinghamshire ICSNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Developing a core outcome set for patient-reported symptom monitoring to reduce hospital admissions for patients with heart failure

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Clayton, Louise
    Keyword
    Consensus
    Heart failure
    Patient-reported outcomes measures
    Date
    2022-04-11
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.1093/eurjcn/zvac019
    Publisher's URL
    https://academic.oup.com/eurjcn/article/21/8/830/6566388
    Abstract
    Aims: In patients with heart failure (HF), hospitalization rates are increasing, particularly for non-HF causes and over half may be avoidable. Self-monitoring of symptoms plays a key part in the early identification of deterioration. Our objective was to develop expert consensus for a core outcome set (COS) of symptoms to be monitored by patients, using validated single-item patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), focused on the key priority of reducing admissions in HF. Methods and results: A rigorous COS development process incorporating systematic review, modified e-Delphi and nominal group technique (NGT) methods. Participants included 24 HF patients, 4 carers, 29 HF nurses, and 9 doctors. In three Delphi and NGT rounds, participants rated potential outcomes on their importance before a HF or a non-HF admission using a 5-point Likert scale. Opinion change between rounds was assessed and a two-thirds threshold was used for outcome selection.Item generation using systematic review identified 100 validated single-item PROMs covering 34 symptoms or signs, relevant to admission for people with HF. De-duplication and formal consensus processes, resulted in a COS comprising eight symptoms and signs; shortness of breath, arm or leg swelling, abdomen bloating, palpitations, weight gain, chest pain, anxiety, and overall health. In the NGT, a numerical rating scale was selected as the optimal approach to symptom monitoring. Conclusion: Recognition of a range of HF-specific and general symptoms, alongside comorbidities, is an important consideration for admission prevention. Further work is needed to validate and integrate the COS in routine care with the aim of facilitating faster identification of clinical deterioration.
    Citation
    Lawson, C. A., Lam, C., Jaarsma, T., Kadam, U., Stromberg, A., Ali, M., Tay, W. T., Clayton, L., Khunti, K., & Squire, I. (2022). Developing a core outcome set for patient-reported symptom monitoring to reduce hospital admissions for patients with heart failure. European journal of cardiovascular nursing, 21(8), 830–839. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvac019
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/16531
    Collections
    UHL Cardiology

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2026)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.