• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
    • UHL Acute Medicine/ED and Specialist Medicine
    • UHL Diabetology
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
    • UHL Acute Medicine/ED and Specialist Medicine
    • UHL Diabetology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNottingham and Nottinghamshire ICSNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A comparison of dietary intake between individuals undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in the United Kingdom and China

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    March, Daniel
    Highton, Patrick
    Ruddock, Nicki
    Burton, James
    Date
    2021-04-19
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.1053/j.jrn.2021.03.003
    Publisher's URL
    https://www.jrnjournal.org/article/S1051-2276(21)00085-6/fulltext
    Abstract
    Objective: Protein-energy wasting is highly prevalent in people with end-stage kidney disease receiving regular hemodialysis. Currently, it is unclear what the optimal nutritional recommendations are, which is further complicated by differences in dietary patterns between countries. The aim of the study was to understand and compare dietary intake between individuals receiving hemodialysis in Leicester, UK and Nantong, China. Methods: The study assessed 40 UK and 44 Chinese participants' dietary intake over a period of 14 days using 24-hour diet recall interviews. Nutritional blood parameters were obtained from medical records. Food consumed by participants in the UK and China was analyzed using the Nutritics and Nutrition calculator to quantify nutritional intake. Results: Energy and protein intake were comparable between UK and Chinese participants, but with both below the recommended daily intake. Potassium intake was higher in UK participants compared to Chinese participants (2,115 [888] versus 1,159 [861] mg/d; P < .001), as was calcium (618 [257] versus 360 [312] mg/d; P < .001) and phosphate intake (927 [485] versus 697 [434] mg/d; P = .007). Vitamin C intake was lower in UK participants compared to their Chinese counterparts (39 [51] versus 64 [42] mg/d; P = .024). Data are reported here as median (interquartile range). Conclusion: Both UK and Chinese hemodialysis participants have insufficient protein and energy in their diet. New strategies are required to increase protein and energy intakes. All participants had inadequate daily intake of vitamins C and D; there may well be a role in the oral supplementation of these vitamins, and further studies are urgently needed.
    Citation
    Song, Y., March, D. S., Biruete, A., Kistler, B. M., Nixon, D. D. G., Highton, P. J., Vogt, B. P., Ruddock, N., Wilund, K. R., Smith, A. C., & Burton, J. O. (2022). A Comparison of Dietary Intake Between Individuals Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis in the United Kingdom and China. Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation, 32(2), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2021.03.003
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/16637
    Collections
    UHL Diabetology

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2026)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.