Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAyodele, Olubukola
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-18T10:57:32Z
dc.date.available2023-04-18T10:57:32Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-18
dc.identifier.citationUmemneku-Chikere, C. M., Ayodele, O., Soares, M., Khan, S., Abrams, K., Owen, R., & Bujkiewicz, S. (2022). Comparative review of pharmacological therapies in individuals with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer with focus on hormone receptor subgroups. Frontiers in oncology, 12, 943154. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.943154en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3389/fonc.2022.943154
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/16784
dc.description.abstractBreast cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of targeted therapies in human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) have provided an evidence base for regulatory and reimbursement agencies to appraise the use of cancer therapies in clinical practice. However, a subset of these patients harbor additional biomarkers, for example, a positive hormone receptor status that may be more amenable to therapy and improve overall survival (OS). This review seeks to explore the reporting of evidence for treatment effects by the hormone receptor status using the RCT evidence of targeted therapies for HER2-positive ABC patients. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify published RCTs. Extracted data were synthesized using network meta-analysis to obtain the relative effects of HER2-positive-targeted therapies. We identified a gap in the reporting of the effectiveness of therapies by the hormone receptor status as only 15 out of 42 identified RCTs reported hormone receptor subgroup analyses; the majority of which reported progression-free survival but not OS or the overall response rate. In conclusion, we recommend that future trials in ABC should report the effect of cancer therapies in hormone receptor subgroups for all outcomes.
dc.description.urihttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.943154/fullen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAdvanced breast canceren_US
dc.subjectHER2 positiveen_US
dc.subjectHormone receptoren_US
dc.subjectMetastatic breast canceren_US
dc.subjectNetwork meta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectSubgroup analysisen_US
dc.subjectTargeted therapiesen_US
dc.titleComparative review of pharmacological therapies in individuals with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer with focus on hormone receptor subgroupsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.943154en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
html.description.abstractBreast cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of targeted therapies in human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) have provided an evidence base for regulatory and reimbursement agencies to appraise the use of cancer therapies in clinical practice. However, a subset of these patients harbor additional biomarkers, for example, a positive hormone receptor status that may be more amenable to therapy and improve overall survival (OS). This review seeks to explore the reporting of evidence for treatment effects by the hormone receptor status using the RCT evidence of targeted therapies for HER2-positive ABC patients. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify published RCTs. Extracted data were synthesized using network meta-analysis to obtain the relative effects of HER2-positive-targeted therapies. We identified a gap in the reporting of the effectiveness of therapies by the hormone receptor status as only 15 out of 42 identified RCTs reported hormone receptor subgroup analyses; the majority of which reported progression-free survival but not OS or the overall response rate. In conclusion, we recommend that future trials in ABC should report the effect of cancer therapies in hormone receptor subgroups for all outcomes.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record