• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
    • CSI (Clinical Support and Imaging)
    • Imaging
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
    • CSI (Clinical Support and Imaging)
    • Imaging
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting depth of invasion of tongue cancers

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Mair, Manish
    Mahmood, Sara
    Fagiry, Rihab
    Ahmed, Mandy
    Menon, Ipsit
    Ibrahim, Niyaz
    Baker, Andrew
    Vaidhyanath, Ram
    Keyword
    Depth of invasion
    MRI
    Nodal metastasis
    Superficial tumors
    Tongue cancers
    Date
    2021-06-23
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.06.008
    Publisher's URL
    https://www.bjoms.com/article/S0266-4356(21)00222-9/fulltext
    Abstract
    The recent eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system has introduced depth of invasion (DOI) as one of its important components. DOI is also important for deciding neck management in superficial tongue cancers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is mainly used to assess DOI, and in this study we have evaluated the efficacy of MRI to detect it. This is a retrospective study consisting of 60 treatment-naïve tongue cancer patients operated on between July 2017 and June 2019. Patients underwent MR imaging on an Optima MR450W 1.5T unit, and MRI was reported by two experienced head and neck radiologists. Postoperative histological DOI was considered the gold standard. The correlation coefficient was derived for postoperative DOI and MRI-detected DOI. A subgroup analysis of superficial tongue cancer was also done. The mean MRI DOI was 13.7 mm and the mean histological DOI 12.45 mm. The shrinkage factor was 0.6 mm. Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.80 (p=<0.001) for Radiologist 1 and 0.85 (p=<0.001) for Radiologist 2. The interobserver variation was low, with a correlation coefficient between the two radiologists of 0.965 (p=<0.001). For superficial tongue cancers there was moderate correlation for MRI and histologically-detected DOI with a kappa value of 0.681 (p=0.03). As per the ROC curve, the cut-off value for MRI DOI to predict nodal metastasis was 4.6 mm. MRI has high reliability to predict the DOI of tongue cancers. The interobserver variation was low. The diagnostic accuracy in cases of superficial tongue cancer was moderate.
    Citation
    Mair, M., Raj, L., Mahmood, S., Fagiry, R., Ahmed, M. M., Menon, I., Ibrahim, N., Ameerally, P., Baker, A., & Vaidhyanath, R. (2021). Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting depth of invasion of tongue cancers. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 59(10), 1275–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.06.008
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/16791
    Collections
    Imaging
    Maxillofacial Surgery

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.