• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
    • Musculoskeletal and Specialist Surgery
    • Orthopaedics
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
    • Musculoskeletal and Specialist Surgery
    • Orthopaedics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal injuries: A multicenter retrospective study

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Chong, Han Hong
    Abraham, Alwyn
    Keyword
    Distal radial physeal injury
    Salter-Harris injuries
    Distal radius injury
    Date
    2022-10-03
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.1177/18632521221126926
    Publisher's URL
    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/18632521221126926
    Abstract
    Background: There are no clearly defined guidelines for the management of distal radial physeal injuries. We aimed to identify the risk factors for patients with distal radial physeal trauma for the risk of deformity, physeal closure, and revision procedure and develop a predictive model. Methods: The retrospective study included patients less than 16 years old with displaced distal radial physeal injuries treated between 2011 and 2018 across five centers in the United Kingdom. Deformity was defined as a volar angulation of >11°, dorsal angulation of >15°, a radial inclination of <15° or >23°, or positive ulnar variance. Presence of a bony bar spanning the physis was considered physeal closure. Results: This study comprised of 479 patients. In that, 32 (6.6%) patients had a second procedure. Also, 49 (10.2%) patients had closure of physis, and 28 (6%) patients had deformity at the end of follow-up. The occurrence of deformity had a strong correlation with age (p = 0.04) and immobilization duration (p = 0.003). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that age >12.5 years (p = 0.006) and sagittal angulation of >21.7° (p = 0.002) had a higher odd of deformity. Immobilization for <4.5 weeks (p = 0.01) had a higher revision rate. The nomograms showed good calibration, with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 75%. Interpretation: The nomograms provide accurate, pragmatic multivariate predictive models. Anatomical reduction is recommended in patients >12.5 years of age with >22° of dorsal angulation with cast immobilization for no less than 4.5 weeks. Any revision procedure should be performed within 11 days from the date of injury to reduce the risk of physeal damage.
    Citation
    Kannan, S., Chong, H. H., Fadulelmola, A., Emmerson, B., McConaghie, G., Lennox-Warburton, H., Eardley, W., Venkatachalam, S., Abraham, A., & Henman, P. (2022). A prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal injuries: A multicenter retrospective study. Journal of children's orthopaedics, 16(5), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521221126926
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/16841
    Collections
    Orthopaedics

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.