• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    • Clinical Support
    • Radiology
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    • Clinical Support
    • Radiology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Parametric assessment of the effect of cochlear implant positioning on brain MRI artefacts at 3 T

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Dewey, Rebecca S.
    Dineen, Robert A.
    Dick, Olivier
    Kitterick, Padraig T.
    Keyword
    Cochlear implants
    Magnetic resonance imaging
    Brain
    Date
    2021
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher's URL
    https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000003281
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: Brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cochlear implants (CIs) is impacted by image artefacts. HYPOTHESIS: The optimal positioning of the CI to minimize artefacts is unknown. This study aimed to characterize the dependence of the extent and distribution of the artefact on CI positioning. METHODS: Three normally hearing individuals underwent magnetic resonance imaging using a standard T1-weighted 3D sequence. Scans were acquired with a non-functioning CI placed underneath a swimming cap at four plausible scalp positions on each side, and without the CI in situ. The artefact in each image was assessed quantitatively using voxel-based techniques. Two radiologists also independently rated the likely impact of the artefact on the detection of pathology for 20 neuroradiological locations. RESULTS: The procedure was well tolerated. The most postero-inferior CI positions resulted in the smallest apparent artefacts. Radiological evaluations suggested that artefacts would likely limit pathology detection in the ipsilateral temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes, regardless of CI location. Pathology detection in contralateral structures and anterior corpus callosum was rarely affected. Certain CI locations appeared to selectively spare ipsilateral structures, for example, postero-inferior CI locations selectively spared ipsilateral midbrain, deep grey matter, and frontal lobes. CONCLUSION: A CI placed under a swimming cap is a feasible tool for observing the effect of CI location on image usability within a single subject and potentially informing surgical planning. Regardless of CI placement, artefacts involving ipsilateral parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes severely limited diagnostic image utility. Between 35% and 70% of neuroradiological features were deemed unaffected by the implant. Copyright © 2021, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.
    Citation
    Dewey, R.S., Dineen, R.A., Clemence, M., Dick, O., Bowtell, R. and Kitterick, P.T. (2021) 'Parametric assessment of the effect of cochlear implant positioning on brain MRI artefacts at 3 T', Otology & Neurotology, 42(10), pp. e1449-e1456. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003281.
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/17023
    Collections
    Radiology

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.