Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWong, Esther M.F.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-17T14:53:58Z
dc.date.available2023-05-17T14:53:58Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationAn, H., Wang, Y., Wong, E.M.F., Lyu, S., Han, L., Perucho, J.A.U., Cao, P. and Lee, E.Y.P. (2021) 'CT texture analysis in histological classification of epithelial ovarian carcinoma', European Radiology, 31(7), pp. 5050-5058. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07565-3.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1084
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/17038
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare the ability of morphological and texture features derived from contrast-enhanced CT in histological subtyping of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). METHODS: Consecutive 205 patients with newly diagnosed EOC who underwent contrast-enhanced CT were included and dichotomised into high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) and non-HGSC. Clinical information including age and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) was documented. The pre-treatment images were analysed using commercial software, TexRAD, by two independent radiologists. Eight qualitative CT morphological features were evaluated, and 36 CT texture features at 6 spatial scale factors (SSFs) were extracted per patient. Features' reduction was based on kappa score, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), univariate ROC analysis and Pearson's correlation test. Texture features with ICC >= 0.8 were compared by histological subtypes. Patients were randomly divided into training and testing sets by 8:2. Two random forest classifiers were determined and compared: model 1 incorporating selected morphological and clinical features and model 2 incorporating selected texture and clinical features. RESULTS: HGSC showed specifically higher texture features than non-HGSC (p < 0.05). Both models performed highly in predicting histological subtypes of EOC (model 1: AUC 0.891 and model 2: AUC 0.937), and no statistical significance was found between the two models (p = 0.464). CONCLUSION: CT texture analysis provides objective and quantitative metrics on tumour characteristics with HGSC demonstrating specifically high texture features. The model incorporating texture analysis could classify histology subtypes of EOC with high accuracy and performed as well as morphological features. KEY POINTS: * A number of CT morphological and texture features showed good inter- and intra-observer agreements. * High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma showed specifically higher CT texture features than non-high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. * CT texture analysis could differentiate histological subtypes of epithelial ovarian carcinoma with high accuracy.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07565-3en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectTomographyen_US
dc.subjectOvarian neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectCarcinomaen_US
dc.subjectImagingen_US
dc.titleCT texture analysis in histological classification of epithelial ovarian carcinomaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s00330-020-07565-3en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.dateFCD2023-05-17T14:53:59Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
html.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare the ability of morphological and texture features derived from contrast-enhanced CT in histological subtyping of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). METHODS: Consecutive 205 patients with newly diagnosed EOC who underwent contrast-enhanced CT were included and dichotomised into high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) and non-HGSC. Clinical information including age and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) was documented. The pre-treatment images were analysed using commercial software, TexRAD, by two independent radiologists. Eight qualitative CT morphological features were evaluated, and 36 CT texture features at 6 spatial scale factors (SSFs) were extracted per patient. Features' reduction was based on kappa score, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), univariate ROC analysis and Pearson's correlation test. Texture features with ICC >= 0.8 were compared by histological subtypes. Patients were randomly divided into training and testing sets by 8:2. Two random forest classifiers were determined and compared: model 1 incorporating selected morphological and clinical features and model 2 incorporating selected texture and clinical features. RESULTS: HGSC showed specifically higher texture features than non-HGSC (p < 0.05). Both models performed highly in predicting histological subtypes of EOC (model 1: AUC 0.891 and model 2: AUC 0.937), and no statistical significance was found between the two models (p = 0.464). CONCLUSION: CT texture analysis provides objective and quantitative metrics on tumour characteristics with HGSC demonstrating specifically high texture features. The model incorporating texture analysis could classify histology subtypes of EOC with high accuracy and performed as well as morphological features. KEY POINTS: * A number of CT morphological and texture features showed good inter- and intra-observer agreements. * High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma showed specifically higher CT texture features than non-high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. * CT texture analysis could differentiate histological subtypes of epithelial ovarian carcinoma with high accuracy.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record