Electrophysiological and fundoscopic detection of intracranial hypertension in craniosynostosis

Abstract

Aims: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fundoscopy and visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in detecting intracranial hypertension (IH) in patients with craniosynostosis undergoing spring-assisted posterior vault expansion (sPVE). Methods: Children with craniosynostosis undergoing sPVE and 48-hour intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring were included in this single-centre, retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study. Data for ICP, fundoscopy and VEPs were analysed. Primary outcome measures were papilloedema on fundoscopy, VEP assessments and IH, defined as mean ICP > 20 mmHg. Diagnostic indices were calculated for fundoscopy and VEPs against IH. Secondary outcome measures included final visual outcomes. Results: Fundoscopic examinations were available for 35 children and isolated VEPs for 30 children, 22 of whom had at least three serial VEPs. Sensitivity was 32.1% for fundoscopy (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 15.9-52.4) and 58.3% for isolated VEPs (95% CI 36.6-77.9). Specificity for IH was 100% for fundoscopy (95% CI: 59.0-100) and 83.3% for isolated VEPs (95% CI: 35.9-99.6). Where longitudinal deterioration was suspected from some prVEPs but not corroborated by all, sensitivity increased to 70.6% (95% CI: 44.0-89.7), while specificity decreased to 60% (95% CI: 14.7-94.7). Where longitudinal deterioration was clinically significant, sensitivity decreased to 47.1% (23.0-72.2) and specificity increased to 100% (47.8-100). Median final BCVA was 0.24 logMAR (n = 36). UK driving standard BCVA was achieved by 26 patients (72.2%), defined as ≥0.30 logMAR in the better eye. Conclusion: Papilloedema present on fundoscopy reliably indicated IH, but its absence did not exclude IH. VEP testing boosted sensitivity at the expense of specificity, depending on method of analysis.