Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFaulkner, Lucy
dc.contributor.authorPepper, Coral
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Anne
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-08T13:44:02Z
dc.date.available2023-06-08T13:44:02Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-08
dc.identifier.citationFaulkner, L. G., Howells, L. M., Pepper, C., Shaw, J. A., & Thomas, A. L. (2023). The utility of ctDNA in detecting minimal residual disease following curative surgery in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British journal of cancer, 128(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-02017-9en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1038/s41416-022-02017-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/17170
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer in the UK. There remains a need for improved risk stratification following curative resection. Circulating-tumour DNA (ctDNA) has gained particular interest as a cancer biomarker in recent years. We performed a systematic review to assess the utility of ctDNA in identifying minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer. Methods: Studies were included if ctDNA was measured following curative surgery and long-term outcomes were assessed. Studies were excluded if the manuscript could not be obtained from the British Library or were not available in English. Results: Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 3002 patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) were available in 21 studies. A meta-analysis using a random effects model demonstrated poorer PFS associated with ctDNA detection at the first liquid biopsy post-surgery [HR: 6.92 CI: 4.49-10.64 p < 0.00001]. This effect was also seen in subgroup analysis by disease extent, adjuvant chemotherapy and assay type. Discussion: Here we demonstrate that ctDNA detection post-surgery is associated with a greater propensity to disease relapse and is an independent indicator of poor prognosis. Prior to incorporation into clinical practice, consensus around timing of measurements and assay methodology are critical. Protocol registration: The protocol for this review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021261569).
dc.description.urihttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-022-02017-9en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectColorectal canceren_US
dc.subjectDisease-free survivalen_US
dc.subjectPrognostic markersen_US
dc.subjectTumour biomarkersen_US
dc.titleThe utility of ctDNA in detecting minimal residual disease following curative surgery in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-02017-9en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
html.description.abstractIntroduction: Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer in the UK. There remains a need for improved risk stratification following curative resection. Circulating-tumour DNA (ctDNA) has gained particular interest as a cancer biomarker in recent years. We performed a systematic review to assess the utility of ctDNA in identifying minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer. Methods: Studies were included if ctDNA was measured following curative surgery and long-term outcomes were assessed. Studies were excluded if the manuscript could not be obtained from the British Library or were not available in English. Results: Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 3002 patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) were available in 21 studies. A meta-analysis using a random effects model demonstrated poorer PFS associated with ctDNA detection at the first liquid biopsy post-surgery [HR: 6.92 CI: 4.49-10.64 p < 0.00001]. This effect was also seen in subgroup analysis by disease extent, adjuvant chemotherapy and assay type. Discussion: Here we demonstrate that ctDNA detection post-surgery is associated with a greater propensity to disease relapse and is an independent indicator of poor prognosis. Prior to incorporation into clinical practice, consensus around timing of measurements and assay methodology are critical. Protocol registration: The protocol for this review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021261569).en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record