Different dosing regimens of Tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke: A network meta-analysis of the clinical evidence

Abstract

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke remains the major cause of death and disability and conclusive evidence of Tenecteplase in treating stroke is lacking. Objective: To conduct a meta-analysis to determine whether Tenecteplase produces better outcomes than Alteplase and a network meta-analysis comparing the different dosing regimens of Tenecteplase. Methods: Searches were made in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The outcome measures are recanalization, early neurological improvement, functional outcomes at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale 0-1 and 0-2), intracranial hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality within 90 days from treatment. Results: Fourteen studies are included in the meta-analyses and 18 studies in the network meta-analyses. In the meta-analysis, Tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg has significant results in early neurological improvement (OR = 2.35, and 95% CI = 1.16-4.72) and excellent functional outcome (OR = 1.20, and 95% CI = 1.02-1.42). In the network meta-analysis, Tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg produces significant results in early neurological improvement (OR = 1.52 [95% CI = 1.13-2.05], p-value = 0.01), functional outcomes (mRS 0-1 and 0-2) (OR = 1.19 [95% CI = 1.03-1.37], p-value = 0.02; OR = 1.21 [95% CI = 1.05-1.39], p-value = 0.01; respectively) and mortality (OR = 0.78 [95% CI = 0.64-0.96], p-value = 0.02) whereas Tenecteplase 0.40 mg/kg increases the chances of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 2.35 [95% CI = 1.19-4.64], p-value = 0.01). Conclusion: While not conclusive, our study lends evidence to 0.25 mg/kg Tenecteplase dose for ischemic stroke treatment. Further randomized trials need to be done to validate this finding. Registration: International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) - CRD42022339774URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=339774.