Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCowley, Alison
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Joanne
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-21T13:59:21Z
dc.date.available2023-08-21T13:59:21Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationCowley, A., Bath-Hextall, F. and Cooper, J. (2017) 'Interventions for healthcare professionals, organizations and patients to enhance quality of life for people diagnosed with palliative esophagogastric cancer: A systematic review', JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 15(3), pp. 840-852. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-003108 https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2016-003108.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2202-4433
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/17489
dc.description.abstractEXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Esophagogastric (EG) cancer is the fifth most common malignancy, and its incidence is increasing. The disease is fast paced, and five-year survival rates are poor. Treatment with palliative intent is provided for the majority of patients but there remains a lack of empirical evidence into the most effective service models to support EG cancer patients. Objectives The overall objective of this quantitative systematic review was to establish best practice in relation to interventions targeted at healthcare professionals or the structures in which healthcare professionals deliver care (i.e. models of care and practice) and patients (diagnosed with palliative EG cancer) to enhance the quality of life for people diagnosed with palliative EG cancer. Inclusion criteria Search strategy A three-step search strategy was utilized. Sixteen databases were searched for papers from the year 2000 onward and followed by hand searching of reference lists. Methodological quality Methodological quality was not assessed as no articles were found that met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction Data extraction was not possible as no articles were found that met the inclusion criteria. Data synthesis It was not possible to complete data synthesis as no articles were found that met the inclusion criteria. Results Comprehensive searching and study selection process failed to identify any studies that were eligible for inclusion in the review. Conclusion There is currently a lack of published evidence to establish which interventions and strategies are most effective in delivering services to patients diagnosed with palliative EG cancer in terms of service structure, process and delivery.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2016-003108en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectEsophagogastric canceren_US
dc.subjectFive-year survival ratesen_US
dc.subjectPalliative careen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviews as topicen_US
dc.titleInterventions for healthcare professionals, organisations and patients to enhance quality of life for people diagnosed with palliative esophagogastric cancer: A systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.11124/jbisrir-2016-003108en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.dateFCD2023-08-21T13:59:22Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
html.description.abstractEXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Esophagogastric (EG) cancer is the fifth most common malignancy, and its incidence is increasing. The disease is fast paced, and five-year survival rates are poor. Treatment with palliative intent is provided for the majority of patients but there remains a lack of empirical evidence into the most effective service models to support EG cancer patients. Objectives The overall objective of this quantitative systematic review was to establish best practice in relation to interventions targeted at healthcare professionals or the structures in which healthcare professionals deliver care (i.e. models of care and practice) and patients (diagnosed with palliative EG cancer) to enhance the quality of life for people diagnosed with palliative EG cancer. Inclusion criteria Search strategy A three-step search strategy was utilized. Sixteen databases were searched for papers from the year 2000 onward and followed by hand searching of reference lists. Methodological quality Methodological quality was not assessed as no articles were found that met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction Data extraction was not possible as no articles were found that met the inclusion criteria. Data synthesis It was not possible to complete data synthesis as no articles were found that met the inclusion criteria. Results Comprehensive searching and study selection process failed to identify any studies that were eligible for inclusion in the review. Conclusion There is currently a lack of published evidence to establish which interventions and strategies are most effective in delivering services to patients diagnosed with palliative EG cancer in terms of service structure, process and delivery.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record