Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHull, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorBurton, James
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-25T11:43:19Z
dc.date.available2023-09-25T11:43:19Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-14
dc.identifier.citationCluley, V., Eborall, H., Hull, K., Quann, N., & Burton, J. O. (2023). Progressing the understanding of chronic illness and its treatment: A post-human, ethological understanding of haemodialysis. Health (London, England : 1997), 13634593231200126. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593231200126en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1177/13634593231200126
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/17601
dc.description.abstractHaemodialysis is a common treatment option offered internationally for people requiring kidney replacement therapy. Research exploring haemodialysis is predominantly clinical and quantitative, and improvements to its provision and receipt tends also to be clinically focused. In recent years, however, a number of studies have sought to explore the lived experience of haemodialysis. These studies tend to use semi-structured interviews and present descriptive findings. Such findings serve to raise the profile of patient perspectives and encourage thinking beyond the clinical gaze. To progress this, we apply a post-humanism approach to the understanding of the receipt of haemodialysis. Drawing on findings from a study to explore the experience and impact of in-centre, daytime, haemodialysis we follow Fox and Alldred's ethological toolkit to provide a post-human analysis of haemodialysis. In doing so we argue that haemodialysis exists as a heterogenous and changeable assemblage of multiple and fluid, human and non-human factors that has the capacity to affect. Here we outline this post-human approach and the impact it has for understanding not just haemodialysis but also the receipt of treatment for other chronic illnesses.
dc.description.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13634593231200126?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.orgen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAssemblageen_US
dc.subjectEnd-stage kidney diseaseen_US
dc.subjectHaemodialysisen_US
dc.subjectNew materialismen_US
dc.subjectPosthumanismen_US
dc.titleProgressing the understanding of chronic illness and its treatment: A post-human, ethological understanding of haemodialysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1177/13634593231200126en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
html.description.abstractHaemodialysis is a common treatment option offered internationally for people requiring kidney replacement therapy. Research exploring haemodialysis is predominantly clinical and quantitative, and improvements to its provision and receipt tends also to be clinically focused. In recent years, however, a number of studies have sought to explore the lived experience of haemodialysis. These studies tend to use semi-structured interviews and present descriptive findings. Such findings serve to raise the profile of patient perspectives and encourage thinking beyond the clinical gaze. To progress this, we apply a post-humanism approach to the understanding of the receipt of haemodialysis. Drawing on findings from a study to explore the experience and impact of in-centre, daytime, haemodialysis we follow Fox and Alldred's ethological toolkit to provide a post-human analysis of haemodialysis. In doing so we argue that haemodialysis exists as a heterogenous and changeable assemblage of multiple and fluid, human and non-human factors that has the capacity to affect. Here we outline this post-human approach and the impact it has for understanding not just haemodialysis but also the receipt of treatment for other chronic illnesses.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record