• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
    • UHL Musculoskeletal and Specialist Surgery
    • UHL Maxillofacial Surgery
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
    • UHL Musculoskeletal and Specialist Surgery
    • UHL Maxillofacial Surgery
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNottingham and Nottinghamshire ICSNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A comparison of skin graft techniques with and without plaster back slab dressing in reducing donor site morbidity in radial forearm free flap surgery - A retrospective study

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Lakshmiah, Sundarraj
    Mair, Manish
    Keyword
    Head and neck cancers
    Radial forearm donor site morbidity
    Radial forearm free flap
    Skin graft
    Volar back slab
    Date
    2023-08-02
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.4103/ams.ams_228_21
    Publisher's URL
    https://journals.lww.com/aoms/fulltext/2023/13010/a_comparison_of_skin_graft_techniques_with_and.11.aspx
    Abstract
    Introduction: The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is a commonly used free flap for the reconstruction of orofacial defects because of its versatility and reliability. The donor site is closed with either split or full-thickness skin graft, and one of the common donor site morbidities is skin graft failure. Various techniques to minimise skin graft failure were reported, and we compared the skin graft techniques with and without plaster back slab dressing in the radial forearm donor site. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of 75 patients who had RFFF for reconstruction of oral cavity cancer at two different tertiary teaching hospitals in the United Kingdom between April 2015 and March 2020. Thirty-nine patients from Hospital one had volar back slap, bolster dressing and crepe bandage. In contrast, 36 patients from Hospital two had only pressure dressing without a back slab. Results: The mean age of the study population was 60.65 (P = 0.274). In both groups, two patients had donor site complications. However, there was no significant difference in the donor site skin graft complications with a P = 0.662. Discussion: There was no evidence in the literature to support an ideal bandage for skin graft at the RFFF donor site. Our comparison of two techniques of skin graft dressings with and without back slap did not show any difference in the skin graft take, and the volar back slab did not add any additional benefits. The simple use of foam as a bolster dressing without a back slab is ideal for the radial forearm free flap donor site.
    Citation
    Lakshmiah, S., Ko, Y., Mair, M., Baker, A., & Ameerally, P. (2023). A Comparison of Skin Graft Techniques with and without Plaster Back Slab Dressing in Reducing Donor Site Morbidity in Radial Forearm Free Flap Surgery - A Retrospective Study. Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 13(1), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_228_21
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/17603
    Collections
    UHL Maxillofacial Surgery

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2026)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.