• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
    • CHUGGS
    • Cancer
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
    • CHUGGS
    • Cancer
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    The British Orthopaedic Oncology Management (BOOM) audit

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Ashford, Robert
    Sharma, Vivek
    Rai, Paul
    Mitchell, Lara
    Hutchings, Steffan
    Nichols, Jennifer
    Singh, Harvinder
    Armstrong, Alison
    Brown, Andrew
    Keyword
    Metastatic bone disease
    Oncology
    Orthopaedic and trauma
    Prognosis
    British Orthopaedic Association
    Radiographs
    Thorax
    Pelvis
    Spinal metastatic disease
    Biopsies
    Date
    01/10/2023
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.1302/0301-620X.105B10.BJJ-2023-0443.R1
    Publisher's URL
    https://boneandjoint.org.uk/article/10.1302/0301-620X.105B10.BJJ-2023-0443.R1
    Abstract
    Aims: Most patients with advanced malignancy suffer bone metastases, which pose a significant challenge to orthopaedic services and burden to the health economy. This study aimed to assess adherence to the British Orthopaedic Oncology Society (BOOS)/British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) guidelines on patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) in the UK. Methods: A prospective, multicentre, national collaborative audit was designed and delivered by a trainee-led collaborative group. Data were collected over three months (1 April 2021 to 30 June 2021) for all patients presenting with MBD. A data collection tool allowed investigators at each hospital to compare practice against guidelines. Data were collated and analyzed centrally to quantify compliance from 84 hospitals in the UK for a total of 1,137 patients who were eligible for inclusion. Results: A total of 846 patients with pelvic and appendicular MBD were analyzed, after excluding those with only spinal metastatic disease. A designated MBD lead was not present in 39% of centres (33/84). Adequate radiographs were not performed in 19% of patients (160/846), and 29% (247/846) did not have an up-to-date CT of thorax, abdomen, and pelvis to stage their disease. Compliance was low obtaining an oncological opinion (69%; 584/846) and prognosis estimations (38%; 223/846). Surgery was performed in 38% of patients (319/846), with the rates of up-to-date radiological investigations and oncology input with prognosis below the expected standard. Of the 25% (215/846) presenting with a solitary metastasis, a tertiary opinion from a MBD centre and biopsy was sought in 60% (130/215). Conclusion: Current practice in the UK does not comply with national guidelines, especially regarding investigations prior to surgery and for patients with solitary metastases. This study highlights the need for investment and improvement in care. The recent publication of British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) defines auditable standards to drive these improvements for this vulnerable patient group.
    Citation
    Archer, J. E., Chauhan, G. S., Dewan, V., Osman, K., Thomson, C., Nandra, R. S., Ashford, R. U., Cool, P., BOOM Audit Group, & Stevenson, J. (2023). The British Orthopaedic Oncology Management (BOOM) audit. The bone & joint journal, 105-B(10), 1115-1122. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.105B10.BJJ-2023-0443.R1
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/17672
    Collections
    Cancer

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.