Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalker, Kate
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Chris
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-05T14:03:10Z
dc.date.available2024-01-05T14:03:10Z
dc.date.issued2022-03
dc.identifier.citationWalker, K., Yates, J., Dening, T., Vollm, B., Tomlin, J., & Griffiths, C. (2022) Older adult forensic mental health patients’ views on barriers, facilitators and ‘what works’ to enable better quality of life, health and wellbeing and to reduce risk of reoffending and harm to self and others. East Midlands Research into Ageing Network (EMRAN) Discussion Paper Series, 46. https://doi.org/10.17639/36pc-f722en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.17639/36pc-f722
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/18027
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Research evidence that can inform service provision and treatment requirements for older (aged 55 years and above) forensic mental health patients is lacking, particularly that which is based on patients’ own preferences and experiences. This study aimed to gain an effective understanding, based on patients’ perspectives, of the service provision in forensic mental health inpatient and community services; investigating what could improve or hinder their quality of life, health, wellbeing, progress, and recovery. Method A qualitative approach was taken to examine the accounts of patients. Interviews (semi-structured) with 37 older forensic mental health patients either residing in secure units or in the community were conducted. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Two global themes: ‘Enablers and Facilitators’ and ‘Threats and Barriers’ were identified; these were at three levels: environmental, interpersonal and individual. Results indicated that: the physical and social environment should be adapted to accommodate the needs of older patients (e.g., for physical health, frailty, and poor mobility); prosocial interpersonal relationships with family, other patients and staff needed to be promoted; and hope and positive future focus needed to be embedded to aid recovery. Discussion Findings suggest that multilevel and comprehensive support, that is individualised, is required for this population. This is needed so that: patients are residing in suitable environments that address their physical, mental, and criminal justice needs; social connectedness forms part of their recovery journey; and hope, purposefulness and personal agency is facilitated.
dc.description.urihttps://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7837131en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectForensic Psychiatryen_US
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectMental Healthen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.titleOlder adult forensic mental health patients’ views on barriers, facilitators and ‘what works’ to enable better quality of life, health and wellbeing and to reduce risk of reoffending and harm to self and othersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-04
html.description.abstractIntroduction Research evidence that can inform service provision and treatment requirements for older (aged 55 years and above) forensic mental health patients is lacking, particularly that which is based on patients’ own preferences and experiences. This study aimed to gain an effective understanding, based on patients’ perspectives, of the service provision in forensic mental health inpatient and community services; investigating what could improve or hinder their quality of life, health, wellbeing, progress, and recovery. Method A qualitative approach was taken to examine the accounts of patients. Interviews (semi-structured) with 37 older forensic mental health patients either residing in secure units or in the community were conducted. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Two global themes: ‘Enablers and Facilitators’ and ‘Threats and Barriers’ were identified; these were at three levels: environmental, interpersonal and individual. Results indicated that: the physical and social environment should be adapted to accommodate the needs of older patients (e.g., for physical health, frailty, and poor mobility); prosocial interpersonal relationships with family, other patients and staff needed to be promoted; and hope and positive future focus needed to be embedded to aid recovery. Discussion Findings suggest that multilevel and comprehensive support, that is individualised, is required for this population. This is needed so that: patients are residing in suitable environments that address their physical, mental, and criminal justice needs; social connectedness forms part of their recovery journey; and hope, purposefulness and personal agency is facilitated.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record