• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    • Trust wide Services
    • Research and Innovation
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    • Trust wide Services
    • Research and Innovation
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Are people with mesothelioma who respond to the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey representative of the national mesothelioma population? A data comparison with cancer registry patients from the National Lung Cancer Audit

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Are people with mesothelioma who ...
    Size:
    933.7Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Wilcock, Andrew
    Keyword
    Mesothelioma
    Patient experience surveys
    Lung cancer
    Date
    2022
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher's URL
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100077
    Abstract
    Introduction: More than 2,700 people are diagnosed with mesothelioma each year in the UK. Survival from mesothelioma is poor and to ensure service users' perspectives are incorporated in designing the most effective strategies to improve healthcare in England, the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES) is carried out annually in people diagnosed with cancer. We assessed whether the mesothelioma population responding to the English CPES is representative of the national mesothelioma population. Method(s): Data from all people in England from the National Cancer Registry defined as having an incident mesothelioma diagnosis (2009-2015) were included. Data were linked across multiple sources including CPES. Using multivariable logistic regression, clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were compared between CPES respondents with mesothelioma and all people with mesothelioma in England. Result(s): We identified 15,587 people diagnosed with mesothelioma, of which 1,597 (10.3%) were included in CPES. Adjusted odds ratios showed that representation in CPES decreased with older age, later stage, worse performance status, multiple comorbidities or emergency presentation at diagnosis. Gender was reasonably represented, although people with non-white ethnicity and from more deprived socioeconomic groups were underrepresented. lung cancer nurse specialist assessment was not associated with inclusion in CPES, however, having a lung cancer nurse specialist present at diagnosis was. Representation in CPES was highest for people who had chemo-radiotherapy (fully adjusted odds ratio 6.52 (95% confidence interval 5.34-7.96). Conclusion(s): Responses were included across all sociodemographic and clinical groups, but there was unbalanced representation when compared with the national mesothelioma population. Patients who do not receive anti-cancer treatment are particularly under-represented. It is important to consider the impact of person characteristics on CPES representation when using cancer experiences to plan service management. Copyright © 2022
    Citation
    Nartey, Y., Stewart, I., Beattie, V., Wilcock, A., Beckett, P., Hubbard, R. and Tata, L.J. (2022) 'Are people with mesothelioma who respond to the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey representative of the national mesothelioma population? A data comparison with cancer registry patients from the National Lung Cancer Audit', International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100077 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100077.
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/18131
    Collections
    Research and Innovation

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2026)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.