Understanding public perceptions of virtual reality psychological therapy using the attitudes towards Virtual Reality Therapy (AVRT) Scale: Mixed methods development study
dc.contributor.author | Gomez Bergin, Aislinn D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-01T10:05:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-01T10:05:11Z | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gomez Bergin, A. D., Allison, A. M. & Hazell, C. M. (2024). Understanding public perceptions of virtual reality psychological therapy using the attitudes towards Virtual Reality Therapy (AVRT) Scale: Mixed methods development study. JMIR Mental Health, 11 ,pp.e48537. | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 10.2196/48537 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/18196 | |
dc.description | ©Aislinn D Gomez Bergin, Aoife M Allison, Cassie M Hazell. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (https://mental.jmir.org), 12.01.2024. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) psychological therapy has the potential to increase access to evidence-based mental health interventions by automating their delivery while maintaining outcomes. However, it is unclear whether these more automated therapies are acceptable to potential users of mental health services. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to develop a new, validated questionnaire to measure public perceptions of VR therapy (VRT) guided by a virtual coach. We also aimed to explore these perceptions in depth and test how aspects such as familiarity with VR and mental health are associated with these perceptions, using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional mixed methods design and conducted an exploratory factor analysis of a questionnaire that we developed, the Attitudes Towards Virtual Reality Therapy (AVRT) Scale, and a qualitative content analysis of the data collected through free-text responses during completion of the questionnaire. RESULTS: We received 295 responses and identified 4 factors within the AVRT Scale, including attitudes toward VRT, expectation of presence, preference for VRT, and cost-effectiveness. We found that being more familiar with VR was correlated with more positive attitudes toward VRT (factor 1), a higher expectation of presence (factor 2), a preference for VRT over face-to-face therapy (factor 3), and a belief that VRT is cost-effective (factor 4). Qualitative data supported the factors we identified and indicated that VRT is acceptable when delivered at home and guided by a virtual coach. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to validate a scale to explore attitudes toward VRT guided by a virtual coach. Our findings indicate that people are willing to try VRT, particularly because it offers increased access and choice, and that as VR becomes ubiquitous, they will also have positive attitudes toward VRT. Future research should further validate the AVRT Scale. | |
dc.description.uri | https://mental.jmir.org/2024/1/e48537/ | en_US |
dc.format | Full text uploaded | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | Virtual reality | en_US |
dc.subject | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject | Surveys and questionnaires | en_US |
dc.subject | Mental health | en_US |
dc.title | Understanding public perceptions of virtual reality psychological therapy using the attitudes towards Virtual Reality Therapy (AVRT) Scale: Mixed methods development study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
rioxxterms.funder | Default funder | en_US |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | Default project | en_US |
rioxxterms.version | NA | en_US |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_US |
refterms.dateFOA | 2024-02-07T13:57:00Z | |
refterms.panel | Unspecified | en_US |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2024 | |
html.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) psychological therapy has the potential to increase access to evidence-based mental health interventions by automating their delivery while maintaining outcomes. However, it is unclear whether these more automated therapies are acceptable to potential users of mental health services. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to develop a new, validated questionnaire to measure public perceptions of VR therapy (VRT) guided by a virtual coach. We also aimed to explore these perceptions in depth and test how aspects such as familiarity with VR and mental health are associated with these perceptions, using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional mixed methods design and conducted an exploratory factor analysis of a questionnaire that we developed, the Attitudes Towards Virtual Reality Therapy (AVRT) Scale, and a qualitative content analysis of the data collected through free-text responses during completion of the questionnaire. RESULTS: We received 295 responses and identified 4 factors within the AVRT Scale, including attitudes toward VRT, expectation of presence, preference for VRT, and cost-effectiveness. We found that being more familiar with VR was correlated with more positive attitudes toward VRT (factor 1), a higher expectation of presence (factor 2), a preference for VRT over face-to-face therapy (factor 3), and a belief that VRT is cost-effective (factor 4). Qualitative data supported the factors we identified and indicated that VRT is acceptable when delivered at home and guided by a virtual coach. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to validate a scale to explore attitudes toward VRT guided by a virtual coach. Our findings indicate that people are willing to try VRT, particularly because it offers increased access and choice, and that as VR becomes ubiquitous, they will also have positive attitudes toward VRT. Future research should further validate the AVRT Scale. | en_US |
rioxxterms.funder.project | 94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cd | en_US |