Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRodwell, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Mervyn
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-14T12:15:35Z
dc.date.available2024-02-14T12:15:35Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-20
dc.identifier.citationRodwell, V., Patil, M., Kuht, H. J., Neuhauss, S. C. F., Norton, W. H. J., & Thomas, M. G. (2023). Zebrafish Optokinetic Reflex: Minimal Reporting Guidelines and Recommendations. Biology, 13(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13010004en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3390/biology13010004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/18236
dc.description.abstractOptokinetic reflex (OKR) assays in zebrafish models are a valuable tool for studying a diverse range of ophthalmological and neurological conditions. Despite its increasing popularity in recent years, there are no clear reporting guidelines for the assay. Following reporting guidelines in research enhances reproducibility, reduces bias, and mitigates underreporting and poor methodologies in published works. To better understand optimal reporting standards for an OKR assay in zebrafish, we performed a systematic literature review exploring the animal, environmental, and technical factors that should be considered. Using search criteria from three online databases, a total of 109 research papers were selected for review. Multiple crucial factors were identified, including larval characteristics, sample size, fixing method, OKR set-up, distance of stimulus, detailed stimulus parameters, eye recording, and eye movement analysis. The outcome of the literature analysis highlighted the insufficient information provided in past research papers and the lack of a systematic way to present the parameters related to each of the experimental factors. To circumvent any future errors and champion robust transparent research, we have created the zebrafish optokinetic (ZOK) reflex minimal reporting guideline.
dc.description.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/13/1/4en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectOKNen_US
dc.subjectOKRen_US
dc.subjectbehavioural assayen_US
dc.subjectdanio rerioen_US
dc.subjectguidanceen_US
dc.subjectguidelineen_US
dc.subjectoptokineticen_US
dc.subjectzebrafishen_US
dc.titleZebrafish optokinetic reflex: minimal reporting guidelines and recommendationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.3390/biology13010004en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
html.description.abstractOptokinetic reflex (OKR) assays in zebrafish models are a valuable tool for studying a diverse range of ophthalmological and neurological conditions. Despite its increasing popularity in recent years, there are no clear reporting guidelines for the assay. Following reporting guidelines in research enhances reproducibility, reduces bias, and mitigates underreporting and poor methodologies in published works. To better understand optimal reporting standards for an OKR assay in zebrafish, we performed a systematic literature review exploring the animal, environmental, and technical factors that should be considered. Using search criteria from three online databases, a total of 109 research papers were selected for review. Multiple crucial factors were identified, including larval characteristics, sample size, fixing method, OKR set-up, distance of stimulus, detailed stimulus parameters, eye recording, and eye movement analysis. The outcome of the literature analysis highlighted the insufficient information provided in past research papers and the lack of a systematic way to present the parameters related to each of the experimental factors. To circumvent any future errors and champion robust transparent research, we have created the zebrafish optokinetic (ZOK) reflex minimal reporting guideline.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record