• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    • Trust wide Services
    • Research and Innovation
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    • Trust wide Services
    • Research and Innovation
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Misappropriation of the 1986 WHO analgesic ladder: The pitfalls of labelling opioids as weak or strong

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Lobo, Dileep N.
    Keyword
    Analgesia
    Opiods
    Pain management
    Cancer pain
    Date
    2022
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher's URL
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.004
    Abstract
    Opioids have a vital role in alleviating pain from cancer and surgery. Despite good intentions, it is now recognised that the original WHO Cancer Pain Relief guidance from 1986, in which opioids were classified as either weak or strong, has been both inadvertently and purposefully misused, thereby contributing to harm from opioid use and misuse. However, the recommendation in the 2018 update of the WHO analgesic ladder that a combination of a high-potency opioid with simple analgesics is better than alternative analgesics for the maintenance of pain relief is also applicable to patients who require short-term opioids. Furthermore, because potential harm through opioid use and misuse is intrinsic to all opioids, whether weak or strong, we argue that the arbitrary classification of opioids either as weak or strong should be discontinued, as this description is not helpful to either prescribers or consumers. Copyright © 2022 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Citation
    Crush, J., Levy, N., Knaggs, R.D. and Lobo, D.N. (2022) 'Misappropriation of the 1986 WHO analgesic ladder: The pitfalls of labelling opioids as weak or strong', British Journal of Anaesthesia, 129(2), pp. 137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.004.
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/18317
    Note
    Available to read on the publisher's website here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.004.
    Collections
    Research and Innovation

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.