Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHerrod, Philip J. J.
dc.contributor.authorKwok, Alex T.
dc.contributor.authorLobo, Dileep N.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T15:24:01Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T15:24:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationHerrod, P.J.J., Kwok, A.T. and Lobo, D.N. (2022) 'Randomized clinical trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis: Meta-analysis', BJS Open, 6(4), pp. zrac100. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac100 https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac100.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2474-9842
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/18363
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: This aim of this study was to provide an updated meta-analysis comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy in adults (16 years or older) with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. METHODS: A search for randomized clinical trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy in adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis from inception to 3 October 2021 in MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL with no language constraints was performed. Studies were excluded if they included paediatric participants or those with complicated appendicitis. Data on complications of treatment, treatment efficacy (defined in the antibiotic group as not undergoing appendicectomy within 1 year of enrolment, versus surgery without complications or no negative histology in the appendicectomy group), readmissions, and length of stay (LOS) were presented. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 3203 participants (1613 antibiotics/1590 appendicectomy; 2041 males/1162 females) were included. There was no significant benefit of antibiotic treatment on complication rates (risk ratio (RR) 0.66, 95 per cent c.i. 0.41 to 1.04). Antibiotics had a reduced treatment efficacy compared with appendicectomy (RR 0.75, 95 per cent c.i. 0.63 to 0.89). Antibiotic treatment at 1 year was successful in 1016 of 1613 (62.9 per cent) participants. There was a six-fold increase in hospital readmissions within 1 year of enrolment in participants receiving antibiotic treatment (RR 6.28, 95 per cent c.i. 2.87 to 13.74). There was no difference in index admission LOS (mean difference 0.15 days (95 per cent c.i. -0.05 to 0.35)). CONCLUSIONS: Earlier optimism regarding the benefits of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis does not persist at the same level now that further, large trials have been included. If antibiotic treatment is to be offered routinely as first-line therapy, patients should be counselled appropriately. Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac100en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAppendicitisen_US
dc.subjectAnti-bacterial agentsen_US
dc.subjectAppendectomyen_US
dc.titleRandomized clinical trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis: Meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/bjsopen/zrac100en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.dateFCD2024-03-13T15:24:03Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-03-13T15:24:03Z
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
html.description.abstractBACKGROUND: This aim of this study was to provide an updated meta-analysis comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy in adults (16 years or older) with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. METHODS: A search for randomized clinical trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy in adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis from inception to 3 October 2021 in MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL with no language constraints was performed. Studies were excluded if they included paediatric participants or those with complicated appendicitis. Data on complications of treatment, treatment efficacy (defined in the antibiotic group as not undergoing appendicectomy within 1 year of enrolment, versus surgery without complications or no negative histology in the appendicectomy group), readmissions, and length of stay (LOS) were presented. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 3203 participants (1613 antibiotics/1590 appendicectomy; 2041 males/1162 females) were included. There was no significant benefit of antibiotic treatment on complication rates (risk ratio (RR) 0.66, 95 per cent c.i. 0.41 to 1.04). Antibiotics had a reduced treatment efficacy compared with appendicectomy (RR 0.75, 95 per cent c.i. 0.63 to 0.89). Antibiotic treatment at 1 year was successful in 1016 of 1613 (62.9 per cent) participants. There was a six-fold increase in hospital readmissions within 1 year of enrolment in participants receiving antibiotic treatment (RR 6.28, 95 per cent c.i. 2.87 to 13.74). There was no difference in index admission LOS (mean difference 0.15 days (95 per cent c.i. -0.05 to 0.35)). CONCLUSIONS: Earlier optimism regarding the benefits of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis does not persist at the same level now that further, large trials have been included. If antibiotic treatment is to be offered routinely as first-line therapy, patients should be counselled appropriately. Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Randomized clinical trials ...
Size:
776.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record