Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSeidu, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorThan, Tun
dc.contributor.authorLamba, Amrit
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Pam
dc.contributor.authorZafar, Azhar
dc.contributor.authorHussain, Rizwan
dc.contributor.authorAmjad, Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorCapehorn, Mathew
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorFernando, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorMcMoran, Jim
dc.contributor.authorMillar-Jones, David
dc.contributor.authorKahn, Shahzada
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Nigel
dc.contributor.authorBrice, Richard
dc.contributor.authorMohan, Rahul
dc.contributor.authorMistry, Mukesh
dc.contributor.authorKanumilli, Naresh
dc.contributor.authorSt John, Joan
dc.contributor.authorQuigley, Richard
dc.contributor.authorKenny, Colin
dc.contributor.authorKhunti, Kamlesh
dc.contributor.authorKar, Deb
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-09T14:04:18Z
dc.date.available2024-07-09T14:04:18Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationSeidu, S. et al. (2018) ‘Therapeutic inertia amongst general practitioners with interest in diabetes’, Primary Care Diabetes, 12(1), pp. 87–91. doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2017.09.001.en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2017.09.001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/18782
dc.description.abstractAs the therapeutic options in the management of type 2 diabetes increase, there is an increase confusion among health care professionals, thus leading to the phenomenon of therapeutic inertia. This is the failure to escalate or de-escalate treatment when the clinical need for this is required. It has been studied extensively in various settings, however, it has never been reported in any studies focusing solely on primary care physicians with an interest in diabetes. This group is increasingly becoming the focus of managing complex diabetes care in the community, albeit with the support from specialists. In this retrospective audit, we assessed the prevalence of the phenomenon of therapeutic inertia amongst primary care physicians with an interest in diabetes in UK. We also assessed the predictive abilities of various patient level characteristics on therapeutic inertia amongst this group of clinicians. Out of the 240 patients reported on, therapeutic inertia was judged to have occurred in 53 (22.1%) of patients. The full model containing all the selected variables was not statistically significant, p=0.59. So the model was not able to distinguish between situations in which therapeutic inertia occurred and when it did not occur. None of the patient level characteristics on its own was predictive of therapeutic inertia. Therapeutic inertia was present only in about a fifth of patient patients with diabetes being managed by primary care physicians with an interest in diabetes.
dc.description.urihttps://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/141743/en_US
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2en_US
dc.subjectQuality of Health Careen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Practitionersen_US
dc.titleTherapeutic inertia amongst general practitioners with interest in diabetesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2018
html.description.abstractAs the therapeutic options in the management of type 2 diabetes increase, there is an increase confusion among health care professionals, thus leading to the phenomenon of therapeutic inertia. This is the failure to escalate or de-escalate treatment when the clinical need for this is required. It has been studied extensively in various settings, however, it has never been reported in any studies focusing solely on primary care physicians with an interest in diabetes. This group is increasingly becoming the focus of managing complex diabetes care in the community, albeit with the support from specialists. In this retrospective audit, we assessed the prevalence of the phenomenon of therapeutic inertia amongst primary care physicians with an interest in diabetes in UK. We also assessed the predictive abilities of various patient level characteristics on therapeutic inertia amongst this group of clinicians. Out of the 240 patients reported on, therapeutic inertia was judged to have occurred in 53 (22.1%) of patients. The full model containing all the selected variables was not statistically significant, p=0.59. So the model was not able to distinguish between situations in which therapeutic inertia occurred and when it did not occur. None of the patient level characteristics on its own was predictive of therapeutic inertia. Therapeutic inertia was present only in about a fifth of patient patients with diabetes being managed by primary care physicians with an interest in diabetes.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record