Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSquire, Iain
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-17T11:35:29Z
dc.date.available2024-07-17T11:35:29Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-05
dc.identifier.citationSoltani, F., Jenkins, D. A., Kaura, A., Bradley, J., Black, N., Farrant, J. P., Williams, S. G., Mulla, A., Glampson, B., Davies, J., Papadimitriou, D., Woods, K., Shah, A. D., Thursz, M. R., Williams, B., Asselbergs, F. W., Mayer, E. K., Herbert, C., Grant, S., Curzen, N., … Miller, C. A. (2024). Phenogrouping heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction using electronic health record data. BMC cardiovascular disorders, 24(1), 343. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-03987-9en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s12872-024-03987-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/18812
dc.description.abstractBackground: Heart failure (HF) with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction includes a heterogenous group of patients. Reclassification into distinct phenogroups to enable targeted interventions is a priority. This study aimed to identify distinct phenogroups, and compare phenogroup characteristics and outcomes, from electronic health record data. Methods: 2,187 patients admitted to five UK hospitals with a diagnosis of HF and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40% were identified from the NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative database. Partition-based, model-based, and density-based machine learning clustering techniques were applied. Cox Proportional Hazards and Fine-Gray competing risks models were used to compare outcomes (all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for HF) across phenogroups. Results: Three phenogroups were identified: (1) Younger, predominantly female patients with high prevalence of cardiometabolic and coronary disease; (2) More frail patients, with higher rates of lung disease and atrial fibrillation; (3) Patients characterised by systemic inflammation and high rates of diabetes and renal dysfunction. Survival profiles were distinct, with an increasing risk of all-cause mortality from phenogroups 1 to 3 (p < 0.001). Phenogroup membership significantly improved survival prediction compared to conventional factors. Phenogroups were not predictive of hospitalisation for HF. Conclusions: Applying unsupervised machine learning to routinely collected electronic health record data identified phenogroups with distinct clinical characteristics and unique survival profiles.
dc.description.urihttps://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-024-03987-9en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectElectronic health recordsen_US
dc.subjectHeart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fractionen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.titlePhenogrouping heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction using electronic health record dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps:/doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-03987-9en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
html.description.abstractBackground: Heart failure (HF) with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction includes a heterogenous group of patients. Reclassification into distinct phenogroups to enable targeted interventions is a priority. This study aimed to identify distinct phenogroups, and compare phenogroup characteristics and outcomes, from electronic health record data. Methods: 2,187 patients admitted to five UK hospitals with a diagnosis of HF and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40% were identified from the NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative database. Partition-based, model-based, and density-based machine learning clustering techniques were applied. Cox Proportional Hazards and Fine-Gray competing risks models were used to compare outcomes (all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for HF) across phenogroups. Results: Three phenogroups were identified: (1) Younger, predominantly female patients with high prevalence of cardiometabolic and coronary disease; (2) More frail patients, with higher rates of lung disease and atrial fibrillation; (3) Patients characterised by systemic inflammation and high rates of diabetes and renal dysfunction. Survival profiles were distinct, with an increasing risk of all-cause mortality from phenogroups 1 to 3 (p < 0.001). Phenogroup membership significantly improved survival prediction compared to conventional factors. Phenogroups were not predictive of hospitalisation for HF. Conclusions: Applying unsupervised machine learning to routinely collected electronic health record data identified phenogroups with distinct clinical characteristics and unique survival profiles.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record