Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUsher-Smith, Juliet
dc.contributor.authorSilarova, Barbora
dc.contributor.authorWard, Alison
dc.contributor.authorYouell, Jane
dc.contributor.authorMuir, Kenneth R.
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Jackie
dc.contributor.authorWarcaba, Joanne
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T09:38:20Z
dc.date.available2024-07-31T09:38:20Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationUsher-Smith, J. et al (2017) Incorporating cancer risk information into general practice: a qualitative study using focus groups with health professionals. British Journal of General Practice 67(656) e218-e226 Available from https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X689401en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X689401
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/18866
dc.description.abstractBackground It is estimated that approximately 40% of all cases of cancer are attributable to lifestyle factors. Providing people with personalised information about their future risk of cancer may help promote behaviour change. Aim To explore the views of health professionals on incorporating personalised cancer risk information, based on lifestyle factors, into general practice. Design and setting Qualitative study using data from six focus groups with a total of 24 general practice health professionals from the NHS Nene Clinical Commissioning Group in England. Method The focus groups were guided by a schedule covering current provision of lifestyle advice relating to cancer and views on incorporating personalised cancer risk information. Data were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and then analysed using thematic analysis. Results Providing lifestyle advice was viewed as a core activity within general practice but the influence of lifestyle on cancer risk was rarely discussed. The word ‘cancer’ was seen as a potentially powerful motivator for lifestyle change but the fact that it could generate health anxiety was also recognised. Most focus group participants felt that a numerical risk estimate was more likely to influence behaviour than generic advice. All felt that general practice should provide this information, but there was a clear need for additional resources for it to be offered widely. Conclusion Study participants were in support of providing personalised cancer risk information in general practice. The findings highlight a number of potential benefits and challenges that will inform the future development of interventions in general practice to promote behaviour change for cancer prevention.
dc.description.urihttps://bjgp.org/content/67/656/e218en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectNeoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectRisk Factorsen_US
dc.subjectPatient Educationen_US
dc.subjectHealth Promotionen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Health Careen_US
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnelen_US
dc.titleIncorporating cancer risk information into general practice: a qualitative study using focus groups with health professionalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2017
html.description.abstractBackground It is estimated that approximately 40% of all cases of cancer are attributable to lifestyle factors. Providing people with personalised information about their future risk of cancer may help promote behaviour change. Aim To explore the views of health professionals on incorporating personalised cancer risk information, based on lifestyle factors, into general practice. Design and setting Qualitative study using data from six focus groups with a total of 24 general practice health professionals from the NHS Nene Clinical Commissioning Group in England. Method The focus groups were guided by a schedule covering current provision of lifestyle advice relating to cancer and views on incorporating personalised cancer risk information. Data were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and then analysed using thematic analysis. Results Providing lifestyle advice was viewed as a core activity within general practice but the influence of lifestyle on cancer risk was rarely discussed. The word ‘cancer’ was seen as a potentially powerful motivator for lifestyle change but the fact that it could generate health anxiety was also recognised. Most focus group participants felt that a numerical risk estimate was more likely to influence behaviour than generic advice. All felt that general practice should provide this information, but there was a clear need for additional resources for it to be offered widely. Conclusion Study participants were in support of providing personalised cancer risk information in general practice. The findings highlight a number of potential benefits and challenges that will inform the future development of interventions in general practice to promote behaviour change for cancer prevention.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record