Routine Functional Testing or Standard Care in High-Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review aimed to collate the available evidence on outcomes following routine functional stress testing vs standard of care (i.e. symptom-guided stress testing) in high-risk patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent findings: The most recent pragmatic POST-PCI trial provided randomized evidence showing that routine functional stress testing post-PCI did not lead to a reduction in 2-year ischemic cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality, as compared to a symptom-guided standard-of-care approach. This was also true for sub-analyses including multivessel or left main disease, diabetics, as well as following imaging or physiology guided PCI. In the absence of a change in their clinical or functional status suggestive of stent failure, post-PCI routine periodic stress testing in stable patients on guideline-directed medical therapy is currently not recommended by American clinical practice guidelines. While evidence on the cost-effectiveness of routine stress testing strategy is scarce, physician, payer, and policy-level interventions to reduce inappropriate use of routine functional testing need to be addressed.