• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • NHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Primary Care
    • Primary Care
    • Primary Care Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • NHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Primary Care
    • Primary Care
    • Primary Care Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Comparison of cognitive behaviour therapy versus activity management, both delivered remotely, to treat paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: the UK FITNET-NHS RCT

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    FITNET.pdf
    Size:
    4.857Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Crawley, Esther
    Anderson, Emma
    Cochrane, Madeleine
    Shirkey, Beverly A
    Parslow, Roxanne
    Hollingworth, William
    Mills, Nicola
    Gaunt, Daisy
    Treneman-Evans, Georgia
    Rai, Manmita
    Macleod, John
    Kessler, David
    Pitts, Kieren
    Cooper, Serena
    Loades, Maria
    Annaw, Ammar
    Stallard, Paul
    Knoop, Hans
    Van de Putte, Elise
    Nijhof, Sanne
    Bleijenberg, Gijs
    Metcalfe, Chris
    Show allShow less
    Keyword
    Adolescent
    Caregivers
    Child
    Chronic fatigue syndrome
    Cognitive behavioural therapy
    E-counselling
    E-therapy
    Ehealth
    Myalgic Encephalomyelitis
    Online systems
    Parents
    Pediatrics
    Pilot projects
    Pragmatic clinical trial
    Qualitative research
    Randomized controlled trial
    Young person
    Show allShow less
    Date
    2024-10
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.3310/VLRW6701
    Abstract
    Design: Parallel-group randomised controlled trial. Methods: Adolescents aged 11-17 years, diagnosed with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and with no local specialist treatment centre, were referred to a specialist service in South West England. Interventions: Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service is a web-based myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy programme for adolescents, supported by individualised written, asynchronous electronic consultations with a clinical psychologist/cognitive-behavioural therapy practitioner. The comparator was videocall-delivered activity management with a myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome clinician. Both treatments were intended to last 6 months. Objectives: Estimate the effectiveness of Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service compared to Activity Management for paediatric myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Estimate the effectiveness of Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service compared to Activity Management for those with mild/moderate comorbid mood disorders. From a National Health Service perspective, estimate the cost-effectiveness of Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service compared to Activity Management over a 12-month horizon. Primary outcome: 36-item Short Form Health Survey Physical Function subscale at 6 months post randomisation. Randomisation: Web-based, using minimisation with a random component to balance allocated groups by age and gender. Blinding: While the investigators were blinded to group assignment, this was not possible for participants, parents/carers and therapists. Results: The treatment of 314 adolescents was randomly allocated, 155 to Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service. Mean age was 14 years old and 63% were female. Primary outcome: At 6 months, participants allocated to Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service were more likely to have improved physical function (mean 60.5, standard deviation 29.5, n = 127) compared to Activity Management (mean 50.3, standard deviation 26.5, n = 138). The mean difference was 8.2 (95% confidence interval 2.7 to 13.6, p = 0.003). The result was similar for participants meeting the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2021 diagnostic criteria. Secondary outcomes: Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service participants attended, on average, half a day more school per week at 6 months than those allocated Activity Management, and this difference was maintained at 12 months. There was no strong evidence that comorbid mood disorder impacted upon the relative effectiveness of the two interventions. Similar improvement was seen in the two groups for pain and the Clinical Global Impression scale, with a mixed picture for fatigue. Both groups continued to improve, and no clear difference in physical function remained at 12 months [difference in means 4.4 (95% confidence interval -1.7 to 10.5)]. One or more of the pre-defined measures of a worsening condition in participants during treatment, combining therapist and patient reports, were met by 39 (25%) participants in the Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service group and 42 (26%) participants in the Activity Management group. A small gain was observed for the Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service group compared to Activity Management in quality-adjusted life-years (0.002, 95% confidence interval -0.041 to 0.045). From an National Health Service perspective, the costs were £1047.51 greater in the Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service group (95% confidence interval £624.61 to £1470.41). At a base cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £457,721 with incremental net benefit of -£1001 (95% confidence interval -£2041 to £38). Conclusion: At 6 months post randomisation, compared with Activity Management, Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service improved physical function and school attendance. The additional cost of Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET in the National Health Service and limited sustained impact mean it is unlikely to be cost-effective.
    Citation
    Crawley E, Anderson E, Cochrane M, Shirkey BA, Parslow R, Hollingworth W, Mills N, Gaunt D, Treneman-Evans G, Rai M, Macleod J, Kessler D, Pitts K, Cooper S, Loades M, Annaw A, Stallard P, Knoop H, Van de Putte E, Nijhof S, Bleijenberg G, Metcalfe C. Comparison of cognitive behaviour therapy versus activity management, both delivered remotely, to treat paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: the UK FITNET-NHS RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(70):1-134
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/19208
    Note
    This article relates to a research study that included patients or members of the workforce as study participants from GP practices in Nottingham and Nottinghamshire.
    Collections
    Primary Care Publications

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.