• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    • Medicine Division
    • Cancer Services
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    • Medicine Division
    • Cancer Services
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A Review and Comparison of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    A Review and Comparison of ...
    Size:
    4.448Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Akbari, Amir R
    Keyword
    Adverse events
    Chemotherapy
    Disease control
    Immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Metastatic uveal melanoma
    Objective response
    Median progression-free survival
    Date
    2025-01
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher's URL
    https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/14/3/885#:~:text=Existing%20analysis%20suggests%20that%20dual,in%20terms%20of%20overall%20efficacy.
    Abstract
    Introduction: Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy characterised by poor responsiveness to conventional chemotherapies, posing significant treatment challenges. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies, including monotherapies with Ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab, as well as dual ICI therapy, have emerged as potential treatments. Whilst current research favours dual therapy over single therapy, comprehensive individualised comparisons of the efficacy and safety profiles of these therapies remain limited. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of single ICI therapies individually and compare against combination therapy to guide optimal treatment strategies for mUM. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies reporting objective response rates (ORR), disease control rates (DCR), median progression-free survival (MPFS), and adverse event rates (AER) for Ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and dual ICI therapy. Data were aggregated using forest plots and analysed to compare the efficacy and safety of each regimen. Results: Dual ICI therapy demonstrated the highest ORR and DCR but showed no statistically significant advantage over monotherapies. Dual therapy also had a lower MPFS than both pembrolizumab and nivolumab monotherapies. Furthermore, dual therapy was associated with a much greater AER compared to any single therapy, including pembrolizumab and nivolumab. Conclusions: While dual ICI therapy offers improved ORR and DCR on aggregate analyses, monotherapies like pembrolizumab provide comparable outcomes in specific metrics, particularly MPFS, with significantly reduced toxicity. These findings underscore the need for personalised ICI regimens tailored to individual patient profiles rather than defaulting to dual therapy. Further research is essential to refine treatment guidelines and optimise outcomes for mUM patients.
    Citation
    Alam, B. et al. (2025) ‘A Review and Comparison of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma’, Journal of clinical medicine, 14(3)
    Publisher
    Journal of Clinical Medicine
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/19236
    Collections
    Cancer Services

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.