EPEN-05. Surgery for childhood ependymoma: The ependymoma multidisciplinary advisory group (EMAG) clinical trial experience

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The National Ependymoma Multidisciplinary Advisory Group (EMAG) is the central review mechanism for the SIOP Ependymoma II clinical trial in the UK. EMAG is a multiprofessional group which meets weekly to support decision making. We report detailed surgical outcomes for children with confirmed intracranial ependymoma, discussed through EMAG between January 2020 and November 2022. METHOD(S): Data was collected on resection status, surgical outcomes, reasons for not achieving Gross Total Resection (GTR), number of surgeries and adjuvant therapies. Data was analysed descriptively. RESULT(S): After first surgery, GTR or near total resection (NTR) rate was 69/105 (66%) rising to 83/105 (79%) following repeated surgeries. 17 patients underwent second-look surgery prior to further therapy, whilst 9 underwent second-look surgery after chemotherapy but before radiotherapy. Eight (17%) posterior fossa (PF) surgeries were not completed due to factors including patient instability and tumour attachments. Most post-operative problems were seen in PF tumours with 26/60 (43%) bulbar palsy, 13/60 (22%) focal weakness and 12/60 (20%) cerebellar mutism. Incomplete PF resections were associated with increased bulbar palsy risk (p=0.02, Chi-Square test). 73% of PF patients required hydrocephalus management with external ventricular drainage, endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) or shunt. Longer term hydrocephalus management with ETV or shunt was required in 29% and was more common in those with subtotal resection (R3-RX, 8/16, 50%) compared to GTR or NTR (R0-R2, 9/43, 21%, p=0.03). 27/60 (45%) received post-op NG feeding and 2/60 (3%) needed tracheostomies. Second surgery was associated with lower complication rates. DISCUSSION(S): Our National MDT approach supports collaborative surgical decision making without a need for centralisation of the surgery itself. There was no evidence of increased complication rates compared to historical trials despite a more aggressive surgical approach. We argue for continued centralisation of EPN evaluation to support optimal care for children with this devastating disease.