• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
    • Division of Cancer, Diagnostics and Clinical Support
    • Cancer
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
    • Division of Cancer, Diagnostics and Clinical Support
    • Cancer
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Global practice patterns of sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: a survey from the European Network of Young Gynecologic Oncologists (ENYGO).

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Collins, Anna
    Keyword
    Oncology. Pathology.
    Gynaecology
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    OBJECTIVE: This survey aimed to evaluate trends in sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for endometrial cancer among members of the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO) and the International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS). METHODS: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey among gynecologic oncologists over 40 years of age consisting of 30 questions. It was distributed to ESGO and IGCS members via Survey Monkey and Qualtrics between September and December 2022. Surveys were excluded in the analysis if >50% of questions were incomplete. Statistical analysis, performed with SPSS version 27.0. RESULTS: A total of 302 (70.2%) of 430 participants completed the survey, with 159 (52.6%) affiliated with ESGO and 143 (47.4%) with IGCS. The majority were male 206 (68.2%), and 170 (56.3%) were based in Europe. Most respondents (n = 261, 86.4%) were certified gynecologic oncologists. Indocyanine green was the most common tracer used (n = 234, 77.5%), with higher rates of blue dye injections among IGCS respondents (p = .002). The predominant injection volume was 4 cm3 (51%, n = 154). Most respondents (n = 232, 76.8%) used a combined superficial and deep ectocervical injection technique, with a higher proportion of superficial injections alone in the IGCS respondents (25.9% vs 11.9%, p = .003). Nearly half of the respondents (44.4%, n = 134) started SLN mapping at the uterine artery and continued dissecting laterally. In cases of mapping failure, 77.5% (n = 234) opted for side-specific lymphadenectomy. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center algorithm was followed by 69.5% (n = 210), with 45.7% (n = 138) routinely using ex-vivo green fluorescence or gamma counter measurements. Finally, there was a higher adoption of immunohistochemistry for SLN ultra-staging in ESGO (n = 116, 73%) compared to the IGCS respondents (n = 94, 65.7%), (p = .047). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed significant variations in SLN biopsy practices for endometrial cancer, underscoring the need for global standardization through harmonized guidelines, consistent training, and international collaboration to improve staging accuracy and patient outcomes.
    Citation
    Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Dec 22:100068. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100068. Online ahead of print.
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/19644
    Collections
    Cancer

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.