Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnazor, Fitzgerald Chukwuemeka
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-12T14:15:24Z
dc.date.available2025-08-12T14:15:24Z
dc.identifier.citationJ Surg Educ. 2025 Aug 4;82(10):103618.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/19693
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to use the Kirkpatrick evaluation model (levels 1-4) to analyze the impacts of NPT programmes on learners and tutors within surgical education. METHODS: This study was registered prospectively on the international platform of registered systematic reviews and meta-analysis protocols (INPLASY)- INPLASY202450037. The study was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL was performed from inception till March 30, 2024. Quality appraisal of the included studies was performed using the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). RESULTS: 22 studies were included in the final analysis. The results showed that NPT was better or at least comparable to senior faculty-led teaching for improved satisfaction ratings for most clinical and nonclinical parameters; improved learners' knowledge and basic surgical skills; and improved clinical practice for leading ward rounds (Kirkpatrick model, levels 1-3). NPT did not improve learners' interest in pursuing a surgical career. No evidence was reported for the impact of NPT on healthcare/educational organizations (Kirkpatrick model, level 4). For tutors, there was evidence that showed that NPT had positive impacts on their basic surgical, mentoring and teaching skills. Quality appraisal showed that the included studies had high to moderate quality. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that there is high to moderate quality evidence for the impact of NPT in undergraduate and postgraduate surgical education for levels 1 and 2 of the Kirkpatrick models, with some evidence for its impact on learners at level 3 of the Kirkpatrick model within postgraduate surgical education. Future research should be focused on the impact of NPT on real-life behavioral changes and on organizations (levels 3 and 4 of the Kirkpatrick models, respectively) within a surgical educational context.
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectPublic health. Health statistics. Occupational health. Health educationen_US
dc.titleThe Impact of Near-Peer Teaching Methods in Undergraduate and Postgraduate Surgical Education Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model: A Systematic Review.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103618en_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2025-08
html.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to use the Kirkpatrick evaluation model (levels 1-4) to analyze the impacts of NPT programmes on learners and tutors within surgical education. METHODS: This study was registered prospectively on the international platform of registered systematic reviews and meta-analysis protocols (INPLASY)- INPLASY202450037. The study was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL was performed from inception till March 30, 2024. Quality appraisal of the included studies was performed using the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). RESULTS: 22 studies were included in the final analysis. The results showed that NPT was better or at least comparable to senior faculty-led teaching for improved satisfaction ratings for most clinical and nonclinical parameters; improved learners' knowledge and basic surgical skills; and improved clinical practice for leading ward rounds (Kirkpatrick model, levels 1-3). NPT did not improve learners' interest in pursuing a surgical career. No evidence was reported for the impact of NPT on healthcare/educational organizations (Kirkpatrick model, level 4). For tutors, there was evidence that showed that NPT had positive impacts on their basic surgical, mentoring and teaching skills. Quality appraisal showed that the included studies had high to moderate quality. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that there is high to moderate quality evidence for the impact of NPT in undergraduate and postgraduate surgical education for levels 1 and 2 of the Kirkpatrick models, with some evidence for its impact on learners at level 3 of the Kirkpatrick model within postgraduate surgical education. Future research should be focused on the impact of NPT on real-life behavioral changes and on organizations (levels 3 and 4 of the Kirkpatrick models, respectively) within a surgical educational context.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record