Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAllen, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorBrandon, Liu
dc.contributor.authorBale, Clare
dc.contributor.authorTallantyre, Emma
dc.contributor.authorSchmierer, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorPartlett, Christopher
dc.contributor.authordas Nair, Roshan
dc.contributor.authorEvangelou, Nikos
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T13:03:11Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T13:03:11Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationAllen, C., Brandon, L., Bale, C., Tallantyre, E., Schmierer, K., Partlett, C., das Nair, R. & Evangelou, N. (2023). Patients' experience of the multiple sclerosis diagnostic pathway. In: Furie, K., (Ed.) Association of British Neurologists: Annual Meeting 2023, 11 May 2023 Belfast. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, p.A65-A66.en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1136/JNNP-2023-ABN.202
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/19733
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The 2017 revisions of the McDonald diagnostic criteria promoted the use of lumbar punctures (LPs) to expedite a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Objectives To assess patients’ experiences of the multiple sclerosis diagnostic pathway. Methods Feedback from the 113 participants of DECISIve (DiagnosE using the Central veIn SIgn) underwent quantitative and qualitative analyses. Their views were further explored in 17 participant interviews. Results DECISIve participants felt the overall experience of MRI scans was more positive than their LPs (Wilcoxon signed ranks test Z=-4.4, p<0.001). Information given pre-procedure was considered sufficient by 89% for LPs and 96% for MRI scans. Complications were reported by 72 (64%) for their LP and only 9 (8%) for their MRI scan. Many interviewees reported considerable anxiety before their LP, caused by sharing of negative accounts through social networks or online. Even patients who reported tolerating the LP experienced high pain intensity during the procedure, and that there are surprising gaps in the existing patient literature. Conclusions DECISIve participants expressed a unanimous preference for MRI scans over undergoing LPs. However, for those who do require an LP, recommendations to improve patient information materials and consent paperwork will be presented.
dc.description.urihttps://jnnp.bmj.com/content/94/Suppl_1/A65.3en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Groupen_US
dc.subjectMultiple sclerosisen_US
dc.subjectAnxietyen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectHealth servicesen_US
dc.titlePatients' experience of the multiple sclerosis diagnostic pathwayen_US
dc.typeConference Proceedingen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeConference Paper/Proceeding/Abstracten_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-05-11
html.description.abstractIntroduction The 2017 revisions of the McDonald diagnostic criteria promoted the use of lumbar punctures (LPs) to expedite a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Objectives To assess patients’ experiences of the multiple sclerosis diagnostic pathway. Methods Feedback from the 113 participants of DECISIve (DiagnosE using the Central veIn SIgn) underwent quantitative and qualitative analyses. Their views were further explored in 17 participant interviews. Results DECISIve participants felt the overall experience of MRI scans was more positive than their LPs (Wilcoxon signed ranks test Z=-4.4, p<0.001). Information given pre-procedure was considered sufficient by 89% for LPs and 96% for MRI scans. Complications were reported by 72 (64%) for their LP and only 9 (8%) for their MRI scan. Many interviewees reported considerable anxiety before their LP, caused by sharing of negative accounts through social networks or online. Even patients who reported tolerating the LP experienced high pain intensity during the procedure, and that there are surprising gaps in the existing patient literature. Conclusions DECISIve participants expressed a unanimous preference for MRI scans over undergoing LPs. However, for those who do require an LP, recommendations to improve patient information materials and consent paperwork will be presented.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record