Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTorr, Leah
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-05T13:51:04Z
dc.date.available2025-09-05T13:51:04Z
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Kidney Care Jul 2025; 10(4): 194-197. (4p)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/19749
dc.description.abstractAcute kidney injury (AKI) is not an isolated event, however, is often the start of a long-term risk trajectory for patients. While in many cases kidney function improves, dysfunction is common and carries a heightened risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD), as well as cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Central to improving outcomes is a clear, practical understanding of what constitutes true ‘recovery’ from AKI. Yet, current definitions are inconsistent, ranging from simplistic biochemical thresholds to more nuanced, qualitative judgments. To better understand how AKI recovery is defined in practice within the UK, the UK Kidney Association (UKKA) Special Interest Group and the Association of Nephrology Nurses UK (ANN UK) AKI Community of Practice surveyed nurses working in specialist AKI roles. The survey was sent to all AKI nurses from the ANN UK AKI CoP group via email. This group were chosen as a convenience sample of specialist practitioners who were caring for people with AKI and aimed to gain an insight into how nurses working in AKI care viewed and used AKI recovery. The survey received responses from 18 AKI nurses across 16 NHS Trusts within the UK. The survey explored how these clinicians define baseline renal function, assess recovery and approach follow-up, while also reviewing awareness and use of terms such as acute kidney disease.
dc.subjectNephrology/Renal medicineen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding recovery after acute kidney injury.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2025-07
html.description.abstractAcute kidney injury (AKI) is not an isolated event, however, is often the start of a long-term risk trajectory for patients. While in many cases kidney function improves, dysfunction is common and carries a heightened risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD), as well as cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Central to improving outcomes is a clear, practical understanding of what constitutes true ‘recovery’ from AKI. Yet, current definitions are inconsistent, ranging from simplistic biochemical thresholds to more nuanced, qualitative judgments. To better understand how AKI recovery is defined in practice within the UK, the UK Kidney Association (UKKA) Special Interest Group and the Association of Nephrology Nurses UK (ANN UK) AKI Community of Practice surveyed nurses working in specialist AKI roles. The survey was sent to all AKI nurses from the ANN UK AKI CoP group via email. This group were chosen as a convenience sample of specialist practitioners who were caring for people with AKI and aimed to gain an insight into how nurses working in AKI care viewed and used AKI recovery. The survey received responses from 18 AKI nurses across 16 NHS Trusts within the UK. The survey explored how these clinicians define baseline renal function, assess recovery and approach follow-up, while also reviewing awareness and use of terms such as acute kidney disease.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record