Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHariprasad, M.
dc.contributor.authorRao, M.
dc.contributor.authorElhence, P.A.
dc.contributor.authorBharti, J.N.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, P.
dc.contributor.authorYadav, G.
dc.contributor.authorNalwa, A.
dc.contributor.authorRamalingam, H.
dc.contributor.authorGoel, A. D.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-30T16:41:52Z
dc.date.available2025-10-30T16:41:52Z
dc.date.issued2025-07
dc.identifier.citationHariprasad M, Rao M, Elhence PA, Bharti JN, Singh P, Yadav G, Nalwa A, Ramalingam H, Goel AD. Expression of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 and Mismatch Repair Status in Ovarian Carcinomas. J Midlife Health. 2025 Jul-Sep;16(3):309-314. doi: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_102_25. Epub 2025 Sep 5en_US
dc.identifier.other10.4103/jmh.jmh_102_25
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/19911
dc.description.abstractBackground: Ovarian carcinoma is the third most common gynecological malignancy among women in India, with a poor prognosis despite advancements in treatment modalities. Immunotherapy, particularly the use of programd cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors, has emerged as a promising approach. This study investigates the relationship between PD-L1 expression, mismatch repair (MMR) status, and clinicopathological features in epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). Materials and Methods: A cohort of 50 EOC cases was analyzed for PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) using immunohistochemistry (IHC). MMR status was also assessed through IHC. Statistical correlations between PD-L1 expression, MMR deficiency (dMMR), and clinicopathological parameters were evaluated. Results: PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and TILs was observed in 20% and 14% of cases, respectively. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was absent in most advanced-stage tumors (stages III and IV) and cases with extraovarian spread. dMMR was identified in 30% (n = 15) of cases, predominantly in higher-stage tumors with extraovarian spread and significant TIL presence (P = 0.007). However, PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and TILs was absent in 86.7% and 80% of dMMR cases, respectively. No significant association was found between dMMR status and PD-L1 expression in EOC. Conclusion: PD-L1 expression in tumor cells is predominantly observed in early-stage EOC, suggesting its potential as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target. Although dMMR status correlates with advanced-stage disease and TIL presence, it does not significantly influence PD-L1 expression in EOC. These findings highlight the importance of routinely assessing PD-L1 and MMR status to guide immunotherapeutic strategies in ovarian carcinoma.
dc.description.urihttps://journals.lww.com/jomh/fulltext/2025/07000/expression_of_programmed_cell_death_ligand_1_and.11.aspxen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectOvarian Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectImmunotherapyen_US
dc.subjectCell Deathen_US
dc.titleExpression of programmed cell death Ligand 1 and mismatch repair status in ovarian carcinomasen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2025-09-05
html.description.abstractBackground: Ovarian carcinoma is the third most common gynecological malignancy among women in India, with a poor prognosis despite advancements in treatment modalities. Immunotherapy, particularly the use of programd cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors, has emerged as a promising approach. This study investigates the relationship between PD-L1 expression, mismatch repair (MMR) status, and clinicopathological features in epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). Materials and Methods: A cohort of 50 EOC cases was analyzed for PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) using immunohistochemistry (IHC). MMR status was also assessed through IHC. Statistical correlations between PD-L1 expression, MMR deficiency (dMMR), and clinicopathological parameters were evaluated. Results: PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and TILs was observed in 20% and 14% of cases, respectively. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was absent in most advanced-stage tumors (stages III and IV) and cases with extraovarian spread. dMMR was identified in 30% (n = 15) of cases, predominantly in higher-stage tumors with extraovarian spread and significant TIL presence (P = 0.007). However, PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and TILs was absent in 86.7% and 80% of dMMR cases, respectively. No significant association was found between dMMR status and PD-L1 expression in EOC. Conclusion: PD-L1 expression in tumor cells is predominantly observed in early-stage EOC, suggesting its potential as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target. Although dMMR status correlates with advanced-stage disease and TIL presence, it does not significantly influence PD-L1 expression in EOC. These findings highlight the importance of routinely assessing PD-L1 and MMR status to guide immunotherapeutic strategies in ovarian carcinoma.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record