• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
    • Head and Neck
    • Maxillofacial and Orthodontics
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
    • Head and Neck
    • Maxillofacial and Orthodontics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    The impact of extra-oral facial prosthesis on quality of life for people with aquired defects : a systematic review

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Spooner, Katie
    Chandler, Grace
    Harding, Sam
    Coward, Trevor
    Keyword
    Maxillofacial Prosthesis
    Quality of Life
    Systematic Review [Publication Type]
    Date
    2025-05-07
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.26629/ijmp.2025.07
    Publisher's URL
    https://ij-mp.com/index.php/ijmp/article/view/50
    Abstract
    Purpose: Acquired facial defects caused by traumatic injury or malignancy are likely to affect one’s physical wellbeing. They may lead to segregation from society due to the stigma and the subjective opinions of the individual, decreasing their overall quality-of-life (QoL). Facial prostheses are suitable forms of rehabilitation for people with acquired facial defects. Recently, QoL has been receiving attention important in evaluating patient outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise research reporting the impact of extra-oral facial prostheses on QoL for individuals with an acquired facial defect. Materials and methods: A systematic review was undertaken following Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered (CRD42024403538), and the searches were performed in six databases from inception to 5th August 2024. Results: 1291 records were retrieved after review ten articles were retained for inclusion. The papers were grouped into those assess people with acquired facial defects in either the auricular, nasal, or orbital regions. A total of 363 people were represented. Six QoL measures were used. Across all three groups, QoL improved post-prosthesis. Although nasal prosthesis users reported lower physical and social functioning than those with auricular prostheses. Conclusions: All ten studies reported positive impact on QoL of prosthesis, however their generalizability is limited by varying methodologies and QoL measures, none of which are designed for use with prosthesis users. Despite these limitations, QoL improvements were seen regardless of follow-up duration or prior prosthetic experience. Future research should use standardized, prosthesisspecific QoL measures for clearer comparisons.
    Citation
    Spooner K, Chandler G, Harding S, Coward T. The impact of extra-oral facial prosthesis on quality of life for people with acquired defects: a systematic review. Int J Maxillofac Prosthetics. 2025;8(1):30–41. doi:10.26629/ijmp.2025.07
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/19916
    Collections
    Maxillofacial and Orthodontics

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.