Is open pyeloplasty still a practical option for pediatric patients in resource-limited settings compared to laparoscopic and robotic approaches?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of open pyeloplasty (OP) for treating pediatric pelviureteric junction obstruction in resource-limited settings in the era of robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP). METHODS: A total of 168 patients (56 each) were randomized to receive RALP, LP, or OP, respectively. RESULTS: The operative time for the RALP was significantly higher (P < 0.001) compared to LP and open OP. The length of stay (LOS) for RALP and LP was substantially lower (P < 0.001) compared to the OP, with average stays of 2.8 ± 1.5 days, 3.1 ± 1.2 days, and 6.4 ± 8.1 days, respectively. In the RALP group, 54 (96.4%) had a non-obstructed drainage pattern post-operatively compared to 52 (92.8%) in the LP group, and 53 (94.6%) patients in the OP group (P = 0.363). Only 2 (3.6%) patients in the RALP group and 4 (7.1%) patients in the LP group, and 3 (5.3%) patients in OP group, exhibited obstructed drainage on dynamic nuclear scan. Grade II complications (urine leakage) occurred in 2 patients in the RALP cohort, and in 3 patients in the LP cohort. The leakage typically resolved within 10 days and did not require further intervention. Higher-grade complications (Clavien Grade 3 and 4a), such as hydronephrosis, were identified in both the RALP and OP groups (one case each). CONCLUSION: Due to comparable success rates and minimal complications, OP is a viable alternative to minimally invasive RALP and LP in treating pediatric patients with PUJO, particularly where cost and equipment availability are limiting factors.