• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    • Service Delivery
    • Research Methods
    • Research Methods
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    • Service Delivery
    • Research Methods
    • Research Methods
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Patient and public involvement in secure mental health research : setting-specific considerations and a protocol for involvement in the CORAS study (COllaborative Risk ASsessment and management)

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Clifford 2025 1-8.pdf
    Size:
    812.9Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Clifford, Naomi
    Jeynes, Catherine
    Callaghan, Ian
    Foster, Sheena
    Markham, Sarah
    Moore, Hannah
    Forsyth, Katrina
    Crosbie, Brian
    Fazel, Seena
    Whiting, Daniel
    Keyword
    High security facilities
    Security measures
    Research design
    Patient participation
    Date
    2025
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.1186/s40900-025-00768-2
    Publisher's URL
    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40900-025-00768-2
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) is important in secure psychiatric research because it can help ensure that research is relevant and meaningful, and a positive experience for those participating. However, there are significant challenges to embedding PPIE in research in secure hospital settings, including practical barriers to involvement. A lack of reporting of PPIE practices makes it harder for researchers to learn from previous projects, leading to missed opportunities to improve PPIE in secure settings, and there are no current setting-specific guidelines for best practice. The CORAS study aims to examine collaborative risk assessment within secure psychiatric settings. In this study, PPIE is fully integrated throughout the research cycle, and this protocol describes the PPIE methodology being adopted. By highlighting these approaches and principles, this protocol is intended to be used as a transferrable framework for developing best practice for PPIE in research in these settings. METHOD: This protocol describes the ways in which we will ensure that PPIE remains central to each stage of the research project, from the formation of a smaller grant application PPIE group, through to dissemination of outputs. We discuss principles of recruitment into the PPIE group, ensuring that all areas of the secure mental health pathway are represented, and formally embracing equality, diversity and inclusion principles through the use of an Equality Impact Assessment. We also describe the core activities of the PPIE group, including the co-design of the research materials, recruitment strategies and dissemination plans, how the impact of PPIE will be examined, and practical elements such as around reimbursement and ensuring the wellbeing of PPIE group members. CONCLUSIONS: PPIE in secure mental health service research is important and challenging. This protocol outlines how we will address these challenges and ensure that PPIE is fully embedded in the design and delivery of a large study in secure settings. Although the prospective nature of this protocol precludes the sharing of outcomes and learning from the PPIE, it can nevertheless serve as a transferrable framework for the development that is urgently required in this clinical research field, as well as allow transparent future reporting of what was achieved. Involving people with their own lived experience in the design and running of clinical research studies can improve the quality and impact of these studies, as well as the experience for people taking part in them. In some clinical settings this involvement might be more difficult. In secure psychiatric hospitals things like security can make it difficult for people to be involved in this way in research. There is not much guidance available for researchers on how to do this better when running studies in secure settings. The CORAS study (COllaborative Risk ASsessment and management in secure services) is a research study in these settings that is exploring how to involve patients and carers in their risk assessments and risk management plans (or safety plans). We have developed detailed plans for how to make sure that patients and carers have a central role in all areas of this study, including designing parts of the study and how best to make sure that the results of the study reach patients and carers. This paper outlines how we are planning to do this, so that other researchers designing studies in these clinical settings can understand and build on some of the practical ways of involving people with lived experience. eng publication: N/A. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
    Citation
    Clifford, N., Jeynes, C., Callaghan, I., Foster, S., Markham, S., Moore, H., Forsyth, K., Crosbie, B., Fazel, S. & Whiting, D. (2025). Patient and public involvement in secure mental health research : setting-specific considerations and a protocol for involvement in the CORAS study (COllaborative Risk ASsessment and management). Research Involvement and Engagement, 11 (1), pp.127.
    Publisher
    Springer Nature
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/20017
    Note
    © Crown 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the mate rial. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    Collections
    Research Methods
    Secure Settings

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2026)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.